IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6291-d1970803.html

Is Mass Timber Positioned to Lead Future Sustainable Construction? A Review of Economic, Cost, and Market Dimensions

Author

Listed:
  • Galit Gatut Prakosa

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
    Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Science, University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Malang 65152, Indonesia)

  • Pipiet Larasatie

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
    Virginia Cooperative Extension, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Kiara Winans

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Andrew Goben

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Daniel Hindman

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

  • Brian Bond

    (Department of Sustainable Biomaterials, Brooks Forest Products Center, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
    Virginia Cooperative Extension, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA)

Abstract

The construction sector contributes substantially to global greenhouse gas emissions, making material substitutions a key strategy for advancing sustainability transitions. Mass timber has emerged as a low-carbon alternative to mineral-based construction materials, offering biogenic carbon storage and compatibility with prefabricated and industrialized building systems. This study aims to systematically synthesize the economic, cost, and market evidence on mass timber construction by reviewing 143 peer-reviewed publications, with the objective of clarifying what is empirically known and where uncertainties remain. The reviewed literature reveals three core findings. First, economic outcomes are mixed: while several studies report regional value creation, supply-chain upgrading, and alignment with circular-economy principles, others highlight persistent constraints such as limited manufacturing capacity and uneven policy support. Second, construction cost findings vary substantially, ranging from cost parity or modest savings relative to conventional systems to premiums of approximately 10–15%, shaped by regional pricing, labor availability, transportation distance, regulatory conditions, and supply-chain maturity. Third, market-oriented studies consistently identify slow diffusion, limited practitioner experience, and risk-averse investment environments as key barriers to adoption. Overall, the review shows that economic performance is not yet consistently established and underscores the need for more standardized, context-sensitive, and methodologically consistent evaluation frameworks to support informed decision-making and the sustainable scaling of mass timber construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Galit Gatut Prakosa & Pipiet Larasatie & Kiara Winans & Andrew Goben & Daniel Hindman & Brian Bond, 2026. "Is Mass Timber Positioned to Lead Future Sustainable Construction? A Review of Economic, Cost, and Market Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6291-:d:1970803
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6291/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6291/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6291-:d:1970803. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.