Author
Listed:
- Xuelian Jia
(School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)
- Lingling Xu
(School of Management, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, China)
- Yiding Wang
(School of Management, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang 110870, China)
Abstract
To promote the sustainable development of agriculture and reduce resource waste, this paper investigates sustainable financing strategies for a green fresh agri-food supply chain. We employ a purely theoretical Stackelberg game model and numerical simulations based on hypothetical parameters to develop three financing models for a supply chain consisting of one capital-constrained farmer and one retailer, considering consumers’ dual sensitivity to product freshness and greenness. Analytical and numerical results reveal that: (1) with low financing rates, internal financing effectively alleviates under investment in preservation, leading to higher wholesale/retail prices. In a green-sensitive market, the resulting price premium compensates for cost increases, avoiding the “low quality–low price” trap under external financing. (2) The retailer’s total profit decreases as the internal financing rate rises; higher interest income cannot offset demand loss caused by reduced preservation effort. Thus, a low- or zero-interest strategy maximizes the retailer’s operational profit. (3) As consumer sensitivity to freshness and greenness increases, profit growth under internal financing displays convexity. However, under extremely high freshness sensitivity, external financing yields stronger marginal incentives, suggesting that retailers should adjust profit allocation in the high-end market. The findings provide theoretical guidance for financing mode selection and practical insights for promoting green agricultural sustainable development.
Suggested Citation
Xuelian Jia & Lingling Xu & Yiding Wang, 2026.
"Financing Strategies for Green Fresh Agri-Food Supply Chains Under Capital Constraints: The Role of Consumers’ Dual Sensitivity,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6278-:d:1970384
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6278-:d:1970384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.