Author
Listed:
- Dajing Hu
(College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
These authors contributed equally to the work.)
- Qiujia Lu
(College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
These authors contributed equally to the work.)
- Huiyuan Huang
(College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Hao Yu
(College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Bangsheng Xie
(College of Economics and Management, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China)
- Bingrui Dong
(Xi Jinping Thought on Ecological Civilization Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Social Sciences, Fuzhou 350002, China)
Abstract
How to promote regional agricultural sustainability through ecological compensation policy incentives and penalties has become a major concern worldwide. To evaluate the impact of ecological compensation reform on sustainable agricultural development, this study exploits China’s Ecological Compensation Incentive and Penalty Policy (ECIPP) reform as a quasi-natural experiment. Using panel data from 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2012 to 2022, we construct a Staggered-Adoption Difference-in-Differences (SA-DID) model to identify the effects of policy implementation on the efficiency of agricultural ecological product value realization and its underlying mechanisms. The results show that: (1) the implementation of the ECIPP significantly improves the efficiency of agricultural ecological product value realization. On average, the policy increases the AEPVR efficiency score by 0.0869 units. (2) Mechanism analysis indicates that ecological compensation reform generates information transmission and structural adjustment effects. Specifically, the policy enhances government environmental attention and promotes the integration of agricultural industries, thereby improving the value conversion efficiency of agricultural ecological products. (3) Heterogeneity analysis reveals that the policy effect is more pronounced in regions with higher levels of public environmental concern and lower levels of fiscal decentralization. Furthermore, compared with the combined year-on-year and ranking-based assessment mechanism, the year-on-year assessment mechanism alone is more effective in enhancing policy performance. This study provides valuable insights for both developing and developed countries seeking to improve the effectiveness of ecological compensation policies and enhance the realization of value from agricultural ecological products.
Suggested Citation
Dajing Hu & Qiujia Lu & Huiyuan Huang & Hao Yu & Bangsheng Xie & Bingrui Dong, 2026.
"Does Ecological Compensation Reform Enhance the Efficiency of Agricultural Eco-Product Value Realization? Evidence from China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-36, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6251-:d:1969815
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6251-:d:1969815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.