Author
Listed:
- Juan Henriques
(Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, 4415-491 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
IN+ Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Paulo Ferrão
(IN+ Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior Técnico, University of Lisbon, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal)
- Muriel Iten
(Low Carbon & Resource Efficiency, R&Di, Instituto de Soldadura e Qualidade, 4415-491 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal)
Abstract
Industrial Symbiosis (IS) is a key Circular Economy strategy that promotes resource efficiency through collaboration among companies. While previous research has largely focused on established IS business models, increasing attention has been given to sector-specific implementation and the contextual factors that influence its success. This study develops a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) framework based on the Deck of Cards Method (DCM) to support the sectoral implementation of IS. A key innovation of this study is the incorporation of IS enablers and barriers into a sector-specific MCDA framework, providing a structured approach to support decision-making and implementation. By incorporating stakeholder preferences and prioritizing implementation opportunities, the framework provides a structured basis for decision-making, being replicated and adaptable to other industrial sectors. The framework was applied to the Portuguese cement sector through consultations with experts representing five stakeholder groups, furtherer allowing its validation. The analysis combines the importance assigned by stakeholders to the criteria and the performance of the sector across those criteria. Results for the sector perspective indicate that policy, economic, and technological criteria are perceived as the most important for advancing IS, whereas geographical, social, and management-related aspects receive lower priority. In Portugal, this sector demonstrates stronger performance in economic (17.49–3.04), technological (13.80–5.99), and environmental (14.58–3.19) criteria, while challenges remain in geographical coordination (1.16–7.95), social engagement social (0.79–6.81), and intermediary support (1.15–8.44). These findings highlight the importance of aligning policy, technological development, and organizational mechanisms to facilitate industrial collaboration and resource exchange. The study demonstrates the potential of MCDA as a practical and effective decision-support tool for IS implementation and provides insights for designing targeted strategies to strengthen sectoral Industrial Symbiosis.
Suggested Citation
Juan Henriques & Paulo Ferrão & Muriel Iten, 2026.
"A Multi-Criteria Decision Framework for Sectoral Industrial Symbiosis: An Energy-Intensive Industry Case Study,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6235-:d:1969588
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6235-:d:1969588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.