IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6216-d1968974.html

Digital Infrastructure Efficiency and Carbon Rebound Risk: Cross−Country Evidence for Sustainable Transitions from 39 Economies, 2018–2024

Author

Listed:
  • Sirui Li

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China)

  • Xiangdong Liu

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China)

  • Johnny Fat Iam Lam

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China)

  • Xieqihua Liu

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China)

  • Jinghui Zhan

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Macao Polytechnic University, Macao 999078, China)

Abstract

The synergistic transition toward digital transformation and green development has been widely regarded as a core pathway to achieving sustainable development in knowledge production. Using balanced panel data from 39 economies covering 2018–2024, this study employed a two-way fixed-effects model to examine the associations of the energy efficiency of digital infrastructure and the energy structure with carbon intensity (CI). The findings showed that: (1) Reductions in Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE) values were significantly associated with higher macro-level CI (coefficient = −2.1564, p < 0.05), which is consistent with the possibility of a rebound effect in the digital sector. Further, time-series discontinuity tests further suggested that the surge in AI computing power, especially in 2023–2024, may have coincided with a structural shift in this relationship (Chow test, p < 0.05). (2) A Panel Threshold Regression (PTR) identified an optimal renewable energy threshold at 59.82%. Crucially, the carbon rebound effect remained highly significant across both high and low green power regimes, demonstrating that supply-side energy transition alone cannot fully absorb the exponential carbon footprint of digital expansion. Furthermore, Instrumental Variable (IV-2SLS) and Placebo Break Tests confirmed the strict validity of these findings. (3) The emission-reduction benefits related to digital knowledge spillovers appeared to be subject to time lags and a possible energy lock in effect, while current environmental policies and carbon pricing mechanisms appear to impose insufficient constraints. This study provides a crucial quantitative framework for monitoring and evaluating the environmental sustainability of the ICT sector. By highlighting the limitations of pure supply-side greening and the necessity of absolute carbon caps, our findings offer integrated policy approaches to align the exponential growth of Generative AI with global sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirui Li & Xiangdong Liu & Johnny Fat Iam Lam & Xieqihua Liu & Jinghui Zhan, 2026. "Digital Infrastructure Efficiency and Carbon Rebound Risk: Cross−Country Evidence for Sustainable Transitions from 39 Economies, 2018–2024," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6216-:d:1968974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6216-:d:1968974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.