Author
Listed:
- Fatma M. Shaaban
(Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11241, Egypt)
- Hassan A. A. Sayed
(Yunnan Provincial Rural Energy Engineering Key Laboratory, School of Energy and Environment Science, Yunnan Normal University, No. 768 Juxian Road, Chenggong University Town, Kunming 650500, China
Department of Agricultural Power and Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11751, Egypt)
- Tarek Kh. Abdelkader
(Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum 63514, Egypt)
- Mahmoud A. Abdelhamid
(Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11241, Egypt
Key Laboratory of Smart Agriculture System Integration, Ministry of Education, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)
- Ashrf A. Anwer
(Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams University, Cairo 11241, Egypt)
- Yuri A. Sudnik
(Institute of Engineering and Energy, Russian State Agrarian University, Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow 11241, Russia)
- Evgenii A. Chetverikov
(Institute of Engineering and Energy, Russian State Agrarian University, Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Moscow 11241, Russia)
- Mahmoud Younis
(Chair of Dates Industry and Technology, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohamed A. Refai
(Department of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza 12613, Egypt)
Abstract
Choosing the most suitable tractor is a complex and high-stakes decision where technical performance, financial capability, and sustainability considerations must be balanced. However, tractor selection in existing studies lacks objective, sustainability-oriented evaluation frameworks, leaving farmers vulnerable to potentially poor investments with long-term economic, operational, and environmental impacts. Therefore, this research proposes a software-based Decision Support System (DSS) that incorporates objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models within a management control perspective focused on sustainability and provides a clear, data-driven method for tractor selection for small farmers. Four popular tractor models in Egypt were selected for evaluation based on three criteria related to sustainability: power (C1), purchase price (C2), and availability of maintenance and spare parts (C3). Subsequently, a DSS was implemented using Python, and five MCDM methods—CRITIC, MEREC, Entropy, Standard Deviation (SD), and TOPSIS—were used to select the tractor that best meets sustainability objectives. The findings indicate that tractor T2, which had the lowest purchase price (USD 12,390) and enough power (60 HP), was the best-rated tractor. The impact of each criterion varied by method: C1 was the most important in the Entropy method (0.3657), while C2 was the most important in the CRITIC (0.5552), MEREC (0.3432), and SD (0.5938) weightings. The proposed DSS improves transparency and supports more informed, evidence-based decisions in agricultural mechanization. Overall, the system offers a practical and scalable tool that helps smallholder farmers and policymakers make sustainable tractor choices, contributing to progress toward SDGs 2, 7, 12, and 13.
Suggested Citation
Fatma M. Shaaban & Hassan A. A. Sayed & Tarek Kh. Abdelkader & Mahmoud A. Abdelhamid & Ashrf A. Anwer & Yuri A. Sudnik & Evgenii A. Chetverikov & Mahmoud Younis & Mohamed A. Refai, 2026.
"Selecting a Sustainable Farm Tractor Using a Software-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-19, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6211-:d:1968912
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6211-:d:1968912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.