Author
Listed:
- Ying Li
(School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China
Beijing Energy Conservation & Sustainable Urban and Rural Development Provincial and Ministry Co-Construction Collaboration Innovation Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China
Climate Change Research and Talent Training Base in Beijing, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)
- Wenhui Fan
(School of Environment and Energy Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)
- Yao Qu
(CUCDE Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100032, China)
- Haoxiang Chen
(School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 102616, China)
- Ajuan Yuan
(Beijing Jin Yu Hongshulin Environmental Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 102299, China)
Abstract
Frequent heavy rainstorm disasters have led to the need for temporary storage of large quantities of heterogeneous disaster-related solid waste within a short period, making temporary storage an important issue in the construction and optimization of the urban comprehensive urban emergency management systems. This study takes the “23·7” catastrophic rainstorm event in Mentougou District, an area prone to rainstorm disasters in Beijing, as a case study and develops an auxiliary decision-making model for site selection that integrates estimates of construction waste and household goods waste, an “initial selection—screening—optimization” suitability evaluation, and the optimization of spatial layout optimization. By combining the spatial analysis method of the Geographic Information System (GIS), an evaluation index system covering natural geography, ecological environment, and socio-economic factors was constructed. An integrated AHP–EWM model was constructed, merging the expert-driven, subjective weighting of the Analytic Hierarchy Process with the objective, data-derived weighting of the Entropy Weight Method to determine indicator weights. The suitability distribution for site selection was studied by combining the multi-factor weighted overlay model, and the area most suitable for construction of Temporary Disaster Waste Storage Sites (TDWSSs), accounting for 4.51% of the total area, was identified. Subsequently, multiple constraints—including ecological protection redlines and minimum area requirements—were superimposed to exclude non-compliant areas. Ultimately, a combined optimization model integrating the minimum facility location model, maximum coverage model, and minimum impedance model was constructed, and the optimal site selection scheme was determined via ArcGIS. The results show that, when seven TDWSSs are considered, the coverage rate of administrative villages within the 20 km transportation service range reaches 97.38%. The results also indicate that, when the number of TDWSSs exceeds eight, the increase in the coverage rate tends to be moderate and the optimization space is limited, indicating that the layout scheme with seven TDWSSs is close to the regional optimal solution. This framework provides crucial guidance for post-rainstorm TDWSS planning and layout optimization.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6154-:d:1968018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.