IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p6121-d1967302.html

Calibration of Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Rainfall Using Bayesian Model Averaging: A Comparative Review of Gaussian and Gamma Distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Defi Yusti Faidah

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Gumgum Darmawan

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Bertho Tantular

    (Department of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung 45363, Indonesia)

  • Febrianggi Caesar Immanuel

    (Bachelor Programme of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang 45363, Indonesia)

  • Norizan Mohamed

    (Faculty of Computer Science and Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus 21030, Terengganu, Malaysia)

Abstract

Global climate change is causing an increase in extreme rainfall events, which impacts the risk of hydrometeorological disasters. To support disaster mitigation and early warning systems, accurate and reliable rainfall predictions are required. Although ensemble forecasting is widely used to model atmospheric uncertainty, raw ensemble results often exhibit insufficient bias and dispersion. Therefore, post-processing techniques are needed to improve the quality of probabilistic predictions. The most commonly used calibration method is Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA). This study conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed papers on ensemble forecast calibration using BMA, based on the PRISMA-ScR framework. Furthermore, this study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis involving co-authorship networks of productive authors and bibliometric maps with clustered terms. A total of 35 relevant articles were identified from 49 screened publications. The bibliometric analysis revealed that “ensemble forecasting” and “Gaussian distribution” are the most dominant terms in the research network, indicating that Gaussian-based approaches remain more widely used in ensemble forecast calibration studies. In contrast, studies explicitly applying Gamma-based approaches are still relatively limited despite their relevance for modeling asymmetric rainfall data. The results obtained in this study highlight the importance of developing and integrating more appropriate probability distributions, such as those within the Extreme Value Theory framework, into BMA models. These findings suggest that the selection of appropriate probabilistic distributions in BMA-based calibration frameworks plays an important role in improving forecast reliability and the representation of uncertainty in rainfall prediction. Furthermore, the development of more suitable probability distributions, including Extreme Value Theory (EVT)-based distributions, has strong potential to enhance probabilistic calibration performance for asymmetric rainfall data. This approach is expected to improve the accuracy and reliability of extreme rainfall predictions. The findings of this study provide an important contribution to the development of early warning systems for hydrometeorological disasters and support the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Defi Yusti Faidah & Gumgum Darmawan & Bertho Tantular & Febrianggi Caesar Immanuel & Norizan Mohamed, 2026. "Calibration of Ensemble Forecasts for Extreme Rainfall Using Bayesian Model Averaging: A Comparative Review of Gaussian and Gamma Distributions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6121-:d:1967302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6121/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/6121/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6121-:d:1967302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.