Author
Listed:
- Ming Guan
(College of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)
- Qingfeng Bao
(College of Economics and Management, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010010, China)
Abstract
Ecologically fragile areas typically overlap with impoverished zones, rendering them susceptible to a vicious cycle of ecological degradation and poverty aggravation. Reasonable and diversified ecological compensation methods are closely associated with improved livelihood resilience among rural households in sandy areas. Building on this, we take three leagues and cities in Inner Mongolia with severe sandy desertification as the study area. OLS regression and mediating effect models are employed to examine the impact of diversified ecological compensation methods on the livelihood resilience of rural households in sandy areas, as well as the underlying mechanisms and heterogeneity. The results demonstrate that (1) diversified ecological compensation methods exert a significant positive effect on the livelihood resilience of rural households in sandy areas; (2) perceived fairness and livelihood diversity mediate the association between diversified ecological compensation methods and the livelihood resilience of rural households in sandy areas; (3) the effects of diversified ecological compensation methods on the livelihood resilience of rural households in sandy areas vary significantly across compensation modalities, beneficiary groups, and regions. Specifically, capacity-building compensation exerts a significantly stronger effect than direct-transfer compensation; poverty-alleviated households benefit more than general households; and the effects are significantly stronger in western Inner Mongolia than in eastern Inner Mongolia. Therefore, in optimizing ecological compensation policies in sandy areas, it is suggested to enhance the embedding depth of industrial and technical compensation, and to explore differentiated compensation pathways based on regional market capacity and household group characteristics, thereby promoting sustainable livelihood development for rural households in sandy areas.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:6105-:d:1966894. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.