Author
Listed:
- Noureddine El Haddad
(International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat 10112, Morocco)
- Miguel Sanchez-Garcia
(International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat 10112, Morocco)
- Andrea Visioni
(International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat 10112, Morocco)
- Ramesh Pal Singh Verma
(Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR)-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal 132001, India)
- Abderrazek Jilal
(National Institute of Agricultural Research (INRA), Rabat 10090, Morocco)
- Shiv Kumar
(International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat 10112, Morocco)
- Benjamin Kilian
(Global Crop Diversity Trust, 53113 Bonn, Germany)
- Filippo M. Bassi
(International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), Rabat 10112, Morocco)
Abstract
Aligning plant breeders’ objectives with farmers’ preferences is essential for improving the adoption of new crop varieties. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a Participatory Weighted Selection (PWS) index, previously developed from a survey of 869 Moroccan farmers, by comparing it with biophysical Participatory Variety Selection (PVS) trials conducted on 19 farms across four agroecological zones in Morocco. Novel CWR-derived lines of durum wheat, barley, and lentil were assessed alongside commercial checks, and both male and female farmers were interviewed to gather PVS preferences. The results showed no significant gender differences for the top-ranked varieties across crops, with minor variations in some zones. Jabal emerged as the preferred durum wheat variety overall, while Zagharin2 was favored in favorable zones. Furat-3 was generally preferred for barley, except in certain mountain and favorable zones, and Bakria was the top lentil variety across most sites. Farmers’ PWS responses clustered into three groups, emphasizing consistent prioritization of high yield potential, abiotic stress tolerance, and good nutritional quality. Comparison of biophysical performance with PVS and PWS revealed strong alignment for durum wheat; however, the highest yielding genotypes for barley and lentil were not always the most preferred. Overall, these results demonstrate that the PWS approach effectively captures farmers’ preferences and provides a reliable tool for guiding breeding decisions. These findings reveal that integrating PWS with on-farm biophysical and PVS evaluations provides a robust, farmer-informed framework for prioritizing genotypes and improving the relevance of breeding decisions across diverse agroecological contexts.
Suggested Citation
Noureddine El Haddad & Miguel Sanchez-Garcia & Andrea Visioni & Ramesh Pal Singh Verma & Abderrazek Jilal & Shiv Kumar & Benjamin Kilian & Filippo M. Bassi, 2026.
"Participatory Definition of Farmers’ Preferences to Guide Plant Breeding for Durum Wheat, Barley, and Lentil,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5994-:d:1965088
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5994-:d:1965088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.