Author
Listed:
- Jun Guo
(Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China)
- Guowei Jiang
(Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China)
- Wuzheng Su
(Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China)
- Jiayu Zhuang
(Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Blockchain Application, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China)
- Xiaohe Liang
(Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Blockchain Application, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China)
- Liang Chi
(Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)
Abstract
Weather–yield relationships in arid agricultural regions are shaped jointly by temperature and precipitation exposure, irrigation conditions, crop choice, and management under water constraints. This study combines county-level cotton yield and maize grain-yield data for Xinjiang, China, from 2000 to 2020 with daily meteorological station records assigned to county-level weather exposures. We estimate two-way fixed-effects models that include temperature degree-day indicators and a quadratic precipitation term to examine crop-specific weather–yield associations in irrigation-intensive oasis agriculture. The baseline two-way fixed-effects estimates indicate that a 100 °C d increase in growing degree days is associated with a 2.85% increase in cotton yield and a 1.88% decrease in maize yield. For cotton, the baseline and common-trend specifications indicate a convex precipitation–yield association, with an estimated turning point of 141.07 mm (95% CI: 27.75–225.63 mm), while the pattern is less stable under prefecture-by-year fixed effects. Maize yield is more consistently negatively associated with growing-season heat accumulation. Post-2010 interaction terms indicate crop-differentiated changes in heat sensitivity, consistent with different temporal evolution of weather–yield associations across cotton and maize. Overall, the results show that climate-risk assessment in irrigation-intensive arid agriculture should distinguish between crop types, precipitation regimes, and the management conditions under which weather exposure is translated into yield outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Jun Guo & Guowei Jiang & Wuzheng Su & Jiayu Zhuang & Xiaohe Liang & Liang Chi, 2026.
"Crop-Specific Weather–Yield Associations in Irrigation-Intensive Oasis Agriculture: Evidence from Cotton and Maize in Xinjiang, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5992-:d:1965028
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5992-:d:1965028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.