Author
Listed:
- Haile Li
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Hui Yin
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Xiaoling Yao
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Xiaoying Wu
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Qi Li
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Yanting Li
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Zekun Zhan
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Xuebing Chen
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China)
- Xuanyan Wang
(College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China)
- Bo Xiong
(School of Geography and Tourism, Huizhou University, Huizhou 516007, China
College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USA)
Abstract
The preservation and transmission of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) face challenges posed by uneven spatial distribution, which are particularly evident in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area. This study aims to enhance the protection, management, and revitalization of ICH by integrating spatial analysis with digital platform development. A methodological framework was established, encompassing ICH data collection, kernel density analysis, Thiessen polygon analysis, and transportation accessibility analysis. A prototype digital platform integrating GIS functionality was developed to demonstrate the feasibility of combining spatial analysis with cultural tourism services. The findings reveal significant spatial clustering and uneven distribution of ICH resources, exhibiting a “core–periphery” spatial pattern. The core density value in the Guangzhou–Foshan area is approximately 4.3 times higher than that in peripheral regions, indicating significant spatial disparity. The average area of core-area Voronoi polygons is less than 5 square kilometers, while peripheral areas exceed 50 square kilometers. Accessibility values inversely correlate with convenience: the shortest travel time in core areas is under 20 min, while peripheral areas exceed 60 min. This study not only enriches the theoretical framework for ICH protection and deepens understanding of its spatial distribution patterns but also provides innovative solutions and practical guidance for targeted ICH conservation, revitalization, and the application of digital technologies in cultural heritage preservation.
Suggested Citation
Haile Li & Hui Yin & Xiaoling Yao & Xiaoying Wu & Qi Li & Yanting Li & Zekun Zhan & Xuebing Chen & Xuanyan Wang & Bo Xiong, 2026.
"Digital Integration of Spatial Analysis and Cultural Heritage Tourism for Sustainable Urban Development,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-30, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5947-:d:1964115
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5947-:d:1964115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.