IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p5928-d1963716.html

Federal Carbon Taxation as a Sustainability Instrument: Macroeconomic Impacts, Circular Economy Transition, and Sustainable Development Implications for the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Corrine Willis

    (Woods College of Advancing Studies, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA)

  • Sanghita Mondal

    (Department of Global Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, Trinity Washington University, Washington, DC 20017, USA)

  • Badri Narayanan Gopalakrishnan

    (School of Environmental and Forestry Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

Abstract

Achieving sustainable development requires decoupling economic growth from fossil fuel dependence—a challenge that places carbon pricing at the intersection of environmental policy, economic efficiency, and social equity. Carbon taxation is widely regarded among economists as the most cost-effective instrument for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, yet the United States has not adopted a federal carbon price. This study examines the macroeconomic and sectoral consequences of a hypothetical federal carbon tax using the Standard GTAPv7 computable general equilibrium model calibrated to GTAP Database version 12 (2023). A tax rate of 27.7% is derived from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) average auction price of USD 12.81/t CO 2 for 2023—the lowest among active U.S. state carbon programs—and applied as a production tax shock to the fossil fuel sector. Simulations at the California (USD 32.93/t CO 2 ) and Washington state (USD 53.10/t CO 2 ) prices provide sensitivity bounds. Under the baseline scenario, U.S. real GDP falls by 0.09%, unskilled employment declines by 0.17%, and fossil fuel production and exports contract sharply. Outside the fossil fuel complex, most sectors record output and export gains, and total U.S. net exports improve by 0.33 percentage points. Bilateral GDP spillovers across eighteen trading partners range from −0.17% (South Korea) to −0.01% (Australia), principally through fossil fuel trade exposure. The results demonstrate that a federal carbon tax at the RGGI price can achieve meaningful emissions reduction at a contained macroeconomic cost, supporting the environmental pillar of sustainability. The concentration of adjustment burdens on unskilled workers highlights the social sustainability challenge of ensuring a just transition. The production reallocation from fossil-intensive to non-fossil sectors is consistent with the circular economy framework and contributes to long-run economic sustainability by reducing dependence on finite, non-renewable resources. Revenue recycling, just-transition provisions, and carbon border adjustment are identified as complementary policy instruments essential for aligning carbon taxation with the integrated environmental, economic, and social dimensions of sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Corrine Willis & Sanghita Mondal & Badri Narayanan Gopalakrishnan, 2026. "Federal Carbon Taxation as a Sustainability Instrument: Macroeconomic Impacts, Circular Economy Transition, and Sustainable Development Implications for the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-18, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5928-:d:1963716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5928-:d:1963716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.