Author
Listed:
- Peiyue Zhu
(State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Yitong Yin
(State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.)
- Rongjin Yang
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, No. 8, Da Yang Fang, An Wai, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100012, China)
- Guoying Dong
(State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
- Zechen Song
(School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)
- Ting Zhou
(State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
- Le Zhang
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, No. 8, Da Yang Fang, An Wai, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100012, China)
- Meiying Sun
(State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, No. 8, Da Yang Fang, An Wai, Chao Yang District, Beijing 100012, China)
- Xiuhong Li
(State Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Beijing Engineering Research Center for Global Land Remote Sensing Products, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Abstract
Coastal wetlands, as sensitive ecological interfaces of land–sea interactions, provide regulating functions and ecosystem service values for maintaining regional ecological security. To achieve systematic restoration of ecological functions and intelligent management of resources in coastal wetlands, it is critical to deconstruct the evolution patterns of their landscape configurations across multiple spatiotemporal scales and precisely identify driving factors and ecological risk transmission mechanisms. This study constructs a trinity framework of “pattern evolution-driver analysis-risk assessment” for landscape ecological risk (LER) evaluation, integrating spatial statistical analyses (Standard Deviational Ellipse, Land Use Transition Matrix) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models to systematically analyze the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and multidimensional driving mechanisms of landscape patterns in the Yellow River Delta (YRD), a typical coastal wetland, from 2000 to 2023. The results are as follows: (1) total wetland area initially declines followed by partial recovery, with natural wetlands decreasing persistently and artificial wetlands expanding; (2) Gross domestic product (GDP) and temperature (TMP) are identified as the primary drivers of wetland evolution; (3) Wetland LER levels significantly increase from 2015 to 2020, with the proportion of high-risk areas rising from 10% in 2015 to 23% in 2020; (4) LER is predominantly characterized by High-High (H-H) clustering, with Moran’s I values ranging from 0.493 to 0.672 (all p < 0.001), indicating significant positive spatial autocorrelation. The wetland LER assessment framework developed in this study, grounded in a land–sea integrated perspective, provides decision-making support and theoretical foundations for formulating differentiated wetland restoration strategies and optimizing coastal ecological security patterns.
Suggested Citation
Peiyue Zhu & Yitong Yin & Rongjin Yang & Guoying Dong & Zechen Song & Ting Zhou & Le Zhang & Meiying Sun & Xiuhong Li, 2026.
"Spatiotemporal Dynamics, Drivers, and Landscape Ecological Risk of Coastal Wetlands in the Yellow River Delta: A Pattern–Driver–Risk Framework with GWR,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-25, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5910-:d:1963302
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5910-:d:1963302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.