IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p5904-d1963231.html

How Coupled Carbon Flows Reshape Urban Carbon Neutrality: Spatial Patterns and Differentiated Pathways Across Chinese Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Chen

    (School of Public Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Zhiying Huang

    (School of Land Science and Space Planning, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 052161, China)

  • Lihua Zhao

    (Hebei Provincial Land Consolidation Center, Shijiazhuang 050031, China)

  • Yuhao Feng

    (School of Public Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

  • Fang Han

    (School of Public Administration, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China
    Hebei Collaborative Innovation Center for Urban-Rural Integrated Development, Hebei University of Economics and Business, Shijiazhuang 050061, China)

Abstract

Urban carbon neutrality is increasingly shaped by cross-regional interactions rather than a closed balance between local emissions and sequestration. From an open-system perspective, this study conceptualizes urban carbon neutrality as the outcome of interactions between embodied carbon transfer (ECT) and carbon sequestration service flows (CSSFs). Using panel data for 297 Chinese cities in 2012, 2017, and 2022, an integrated measurement framework is developed to examine spatiotemporal patterns, typological heterogeneity, and driving mechanisms. The results reveal significant disparities in emission responsibility and ecological support across city types. Ecological conservation-oriented cities act as major carbon sequestration providers, while industrial- and service-oriented cities face higher emission pressures and weaker local sequestration capacity. The joint effects of ECT and CSSF reshape urban carbon neutrality through responsibility reallocation and ecological support transfer, enhancing overall performance while intensifying inter-city differentiation. Spatial Durbin model results indicate that carbon neutrality is jointly influenced by socioeconomic development, energy structure, factor mobility, ecological conditions, and institutional regulation, with both local and spillover effects. These findings suggest that urban carbon neutrality is a relational process embedded in production–consumption linkages and ecosystem service networks, highlighting the need for differentiated governance pathways to support coordinated mitigation and ecological compensation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Chen & Zhiying Huang & Lihua Zhao & Yuhao Feng & Fang Han, 2026. "How Coupled Carbon Flows Reshape Urban Carbon Neutrality: Spatial Patterns and Differentiated Pathways Across Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-42, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5904-:d:1963231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5904/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5904/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5904-:d:1963231. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.