IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p5885-d1962922.html

Measuring Perceptions of Walkable Streetscapes in Cultural Heritage Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Hessameddin Maniei

    (Research Group Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning (LLP), Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Elham Mehrinejad Khotbehsara

    (School of Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba 4350, Australia)

  • Dietwald Gruehn

    (Research Group Landscape Ecology and Landscape Planning (LLP), Department of Spatial Planning, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

This study examines pedestrian perceptions of streetscapes in Isfahan’s cultural heritage site by integrating deep learning–based image segmentation with urban morphological analysis. It addresses the opportunity to develop a scalable and context-sensitive method for assessing pedestrian-oriented heritage streetscapes, particularly where conventional street-view datasets are unavailable. Using a U-Net model applied to First-Person Pedestrian View (FPPV) images, five perceptual indices, imageability, enclosure, human scale, greenness, and walking index, were quantified to examine their associations with pedestrian experience. Street width was incorporated as a morphological variable to explore its relationship with perceptual qualities using Spearman correlation and visual trend analysis. The results indicate exploratory associations between visual composition and perceptual outcomes within the analysed heritage streetscape context, particularly between imageability, enclosure, and vegetation structure. In contrast, variables such as human scale and walking index showed weak or negligible associations with street width, indicating that pedestrian activity patterns within the analysed heritage streetscape may be influenced by additional spatial, landscape, and socio-functional factors beyond dimensional characteristics alone. Segmentation-based analysis achieved an accuracy of 83% in classifying dominant streetscape elements, offering a reproducible alternative to traditional survey-based methods. This study contributes a data-driven framework for assessing pedestrian streetscapes, emphasising morphological continuity, human-scale design, and green infrastructure as important dimensions of walkability assessment. It also identifies key challenges, including fragmented spatial morphology and inconsistent urban furniture placement, which may affect pedestrian comfort and use of space. These findings offer evidence-informed design considerations for historic streetscape assessment, with implications for balancing heritage conservation and contemporary pedestrian needs. Future research may refine perceptual metrics, incorporate behavioural or longitudinal validation, and extend the approach across diverse urban contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Hessameddin Maniei & Elham Mehrinejad Khotbehsara & Dietwald Gruehn, 2026. "Measuring Perceptions of Walkable Streetscapes in Cultural Heritage Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-41, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5885-:d:1962922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5885-:d:1962922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.