IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p5883-d1962813.html

A Decision Framework for Sustainable Fiber Selection in Sportswear Integrating Kano, QFD and MCDM Approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Bilge Berkhan Kastacı

    (Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Kahramanmaras Istiklal University, Kahramanmaras 46080, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study proposes an integrated Kano–QFD–MCDM decision-support framework for sustainable fiber selection in sportswear by combining user-oriented evaluation with environmental and technical performance criteria. User requirements are classified using the Kano model and translated into technical criteria through Quality Function Deployment (QFD), enabling criterion weights that reflect both user priorities and product performance. Six fiber alternatives—soy, bamboo, Tencel, modal, cotton, and polyester—are evaluated based on nine criteria covering mechanical properties, comfort-related attributes, environmental impact, and economic factors, with emphasis on carbon footprint and biodegradability. The evaluation is performed using three multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods—TOPSIS, EDAS, and VIKOR—supported by statistical analyses including Spearman correlation and the Friedman test to assess ranking consistency. Results indicate that soy fiber achieved the highest aggregated ranking under the proposed weighting and aggregation framework, followed by bamboo and Tencel, while polyester ranks lowest due to its environmental disadvantages. Overall, the proposed framework provides a transparent and statistically validated approach that integrates sustainability considerations into fiber selection, supporting more informed and responsible decision-making in sportswear design.

Suggested Citation

  • Bilge Berkhan Kastacı, 2026. "A Decision Framework for Sustainable Fiber Selection in Sportswear Integrating Kano, QFD and MCDM Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5883-:d:1962813
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5883/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5883/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5883-:d:1962813. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.