IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i12p5804-d1961515.html

Institutional Innovation Policy and Enterprise ESG Performance: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wenmin Meng

    (School of Finance and Economics, Guangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Laibin 546199, China)

  • Wenjie Li

    (School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Peiru Xie

    (School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Jinsong Kuang

    (School of Economics and Trade, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha 410205, China)

  • Xiaofei Liu

    (Engineering Training Center, Inner Mongolia University of Science & Technology, Baotou 014000, China)

Abstract

The tension between corporate growth and sustainability is a common governance dilemma faced by transitional economies in their green development. This study incorporates corporate ESG performance and its potential influencing factors into the analysis framework and constructs a theoretical model to capture the relationship between China’s National Demonstration Base policy for Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation (MEI) and corporate ESG performance, based on the framework that integrates resource enablement, reputation accumulation and information governance. Leveraging the quasi-natural experiment provided by China’s National Demonstration Program for Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation (MEI), this study systematically evaluates the impact of China’s demonstration policy on corporate ESG performance, drawing on data from A-share listed companies spanning 2010 to 2024. The study finds that the demonstration policy significantly improves enterprise ESG performance, which remains robust after a series of robustness tests. The mechanism test reveals that the policy promotes firms’ green technology innovation by lowering innovation costs, facilitates the accumulation of social reputational capital by incentivizing charitable donations, and compels improvements in information disclosure quality by strengthening market-oriented oversight. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy effects are more prominent among heavy polluting industries, large-scale enterprises and firms at the mature stage. Moreover, industry competition intensity and digital transformation have a positive moderating effect on the policy effects. This paper enriches the theoretical dialogue between institutional innovation policy and enterprise sustainable development, providing empirical evidence for the development of a collaborative ESG governance mechanism characterized by an active government and an efficient market.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenmin Meng & Wenjie Li & Peiru Xie & Jinsong Kuang & Xiaofei Liu, 2026. "Institutional Innovation Policy and Enterprise ESG Performance: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5804-:d:1961515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/12/5804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:12:p:5804-:d:1961515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.