IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5788-d1961150.html

From Toxicity to Sustainability: Burnout, Psychological Safety and Attrition in the Construction Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Murendeni Liphadzi

    (Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa)

  • Francis Kwesi Bondinuba

    (Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University, Kumasi P.O. Box 854, Ghana
    Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, Durban University of Technology, P.O. Box 1334, Durban 4000, South Africa
    Institute for Sustainable Built Environment, School of Energy, Geoscience, Infrastructure and Society, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 5AS, UK)

  • Kofi Owusu Adjei

    (Department of Construction Management and Quantity Surveying, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa
    Department of Construction Technology and Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built and Natural Environment, Kumasi Technical University, Kumasi P.O. Box 854, Ghana)

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between toxic workplace culture and voluntary employee turnover, undermining workforce sustainability in Ghana’s construction industry. While some previous research has found a relationship between a toxic working environment and employee withdrawal habits, few studies have investigated the psychological processes between the toxic work culture and employee turnover in Global South construction companies. Based on the theories of Conservation of Resources and Social Exchange, this research examines the possible mediating factors between the toxic work culture and employee turnover: employee burnout, psychological safety, and job dissatisfaction. Structured questionnaires were used to design a quantitative cross-sectional survey, which was administered to 174 construction workers in Ghana. The data were analysed using mediation regression models based on Ordinary Least Squares (OLS). The findings show that a hostile work environment and a lack of organisational support were the two highest dimensions of work culture assessed as negatively impacting employee burnout, psychological safety, and attrition intentions. Employee burnout was the only significant predictor for voluntary employee attrition (β = 0.3628, p < 0.001), and psychological safety had a significant protective effect (β = −0.1785, p = 0.016). Mediation accounted for 67.4% of the variance in attrition outcomes. This paper shows how a negative organisational climate can undermine the stability of human resources, psychological well-being, and the social dimension of sustainability in construction companies. The results indicate that organisational support, leadership accountability and psychologically safe working environments are important for increasing employee retention and long-term organisational resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Murendeni Liphadzi & Francis Kwesi Bondinuba & Kofi Owusu Adjei, 2026. "From Toxicity to Sustainability: Burnout, Psychological Safety and Attrition in the Construction Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5788-:d:1961150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5788/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5788/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5788-:d:1961150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.