IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5768-d1960883.html

Governance Trust as a Structural Driver of Sustainability Preparedness: A Comparative SEM Analysis in Emerging Market Financial Cooperatives

Author

Listed:
  • Alfredo Salazar-Baño

    (Departamento de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas y de Comercio, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Avenida General Rumiñahui s/n and Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador)

  • Sandra Patricia Galarza

    (Departamento de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas y de Comercio, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Avenida General Rumiñahui s/n and Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador)

  • Angie Fernández

    (Departamento de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas y de Comercio, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Avenida General Rumiñahui s/n and Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador)

  • Luis Simbaña-Taipe

    (Departamento de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas y de Comercio, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Avenida General Rumiñahui s/n and Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador)

  • Fabián Yépez

    (Departamento de Ciencias Económicas Administrativas y de Comercio, Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE, Avenida General Rumiñahui s/n and Ambato, Sangolquí 171103, Ecuador)

Abstract

Institutional trust plays a critical role in shaping organizational responses to risk, particularly in emerging market financial systems. This study examines the psychosocial mechanisms through which institutional trust is associated with preparedness for social responsibility (SR) implementation in Ecuadorian savings and credit cooperatives. Using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) with 5000 bootstrap resamples ( n = 2116), we assessed four competing structural models comparing direct, sequential, and parallel mediation pathways. The findings demonstrate that institutional trust has a significant direct impact on preparedness (β = 0.626, p < 0.001), accounting for 42.3% of its variance. The statistical rejection of full mediation models validates that readiness cannot be exclusively elucidated through cognitive or affective risk perception pathways. Notably, the study uncovers a “Trust Paradox”: contrary to the conventional “trust-as-control” heuristic, trust exhibited a significant positive correlation with both severity perception (β = 0.200, p < 0.001) and worry (β = 0.100, p < 0.001). This suggests that in high-reliability cooperative contexts, trust appears to function primarily as a validator of information credibility rather than a mitigator of threat magnitude. While the affective pathway was significant, its effect size was modest compared to the direct governance effect. These results indicate that preparedness for SR implementation in cooperative finance is driven more by governance legitimacy than by threat perception. The study enhances sustainability research by recognizing institutional trust as a fundamental structural driver of organizational resilience and vigilant preparedness in emerging market financial cooperatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfredo Salazar-Baño & Sandra Patricia Galarza & Angie Fernández & Luis Simbaña-Taipe & Fabián Yépez, 2026. "Governance Trust as a Structural Driver of Sustainability Preparedness: A Comparative SEM Analysis in Emerging Market Financial Cooperatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-29, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5768-:d:1960883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5768/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5768/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5768-:d:1960883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.