Author
Listed:
- Olga Sysoeva
(Department of World Economy, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 36, Stremyanny Lane, 115054 Moscow, Russia)
- Tatyana Goryacheva
(Department of Industry Management and Economic Security, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, 77, Politechnicheskaya Str., 410054 Saratov, Russia)
- Olga Myzrova
(Department of Industry Management and Economic Security, Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov, 77, Politechnicheskaya Str., 410054 Saratov, Russia)
- Alla Vavilina
(Faculty of Economics, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 117198 Moscow, Russia)
- Anna Firsova
(Faculty of Economics, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 117198 Moscow, Russia)
- Alexander Fomenko
(Faculty of Economics, Peoples Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), 6, Miklukho-Maklaya Str., 117198 Moscow, Russia)
Abstract
This paper examines changes in the macroeconomic indicators of the member countries of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) following their accession to the agreement. This study aims to identify shifts in the structural comparability of national economies and to assess the processes of macroeconomic convergence in the context of sustainable development. To achieve this objective, reference pools of CPTPP member countries are constructed, and their digital profiles are developed based on key macroeconomic indicators and grouped into three blocks: (1) indicators of economic growth and the state of the real sector, including GDP (constant 2015 US$), GDP growth, annual %, gross capital formation, % of GDP, unemployment, total % of total labor force, and national estimate; (2) indicators of foreign economic activity and trade openness, including exports of goods and services, % of GDP, imports of goods and services, % of GDP, external balance on goods and services (% of GDP), foreign direct investment, net inflows, % of GDP, and trade, and % of GDP; (3) indicators of financial and macroeconomic stability including inflation, consumer prices, annual %, central government debt, % of GDP, and gross savings, and % of GDP. Based on the digital profiles, similarities/differences in the economies were examined by applying linear discriminant analysis (LDA). The empirical framework covers two periods: (1) 2013–2017 (pre-accession) years and (2) 2019–2023 (post-accession) years. The results indicate that the economies of member countries in 2013–2017 exhibited a high degree of heterogeneity. In contrast, the 2019–2023 period demonstrates a tendency toward partial convergence of macroeconomic parameters, as evidenced by a reduction in distances between country profiles in the discriminant space. While interpreting the results, it is acknowledged that the 2019–2023 period coincided with the effects of the global crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, which significantly impacted international trade dynamics. For most countries, this period was characterized by a decline in several macroeconomic indicators and investment activity, an increase in debt burdens, and enhanced heterogeneity in economic dynamics, which was taken into account when interpreting macroeconomic convergence processes within the CPTPP. The scientific novelty of the study lies in its application of an approach based on the analysis of the structural similarity of the macroeconomic profiles of CPTPP countries, which complements traditional assessments of the effects of economic and trade integration. The practical significance of the findings is associated with their potential use in evaluating the prospects for CPTPP expansion and in modeling alternative scenarios of participation and sustainable development within international trade agreements under conditions of global economic transformation.
Suggested Citation
Olga Sysoeva & Tatyana Goryacheva & Olga Myzrova & Alla Vavilina & Anna Firsova & Alexander Fomenko, 2026.
"Macroeconomic Convergence in the Countries of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Sustainable Development Context,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-34, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5741-:d:1960339
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5741-:d:1960339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.