IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5736-d1960227.html

A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania

Author

Listed:
  • Oliva Gonda

    (Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building E, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
    Institute of Human Settlement Studies, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania)

  • Wilbard Kombe

    (Institute of Human Settlement Studies, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania)

  • Wim Deferme

    (Faculty of Engineering Technology, Functional Materials Engineering, Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Sarah Phoya

    (School of Architecture, Construction Economics and Management, Ardhi University, Dar es Salaam P.O. Box 35176, Tanzania)

  • Griet Verbeeck

    (Faculty of Architecture and Arts, Hasselt University, Agoralaan Building E, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

Abstract

Sustainable agricultural development in rural sub-Saharan Africa increasingly depends on coordinated governance of energy and water resources. Despite the growing deployment of solar photovoltaic water pumping systems (SPVWPS), little is known about how the institutional framework shapes SPVWPS effectiveness for productive agricultural use in rural Tanzania. Drawing on systems thinking concepts, specifically hierarchy, interaction, and interconnectedness, this study analyses the institutional frameworks governing energy and water provision for irrigation and livestock keeping across three rural Tanzanian communities. A mixed-methods design was employed, with qualitative inquiry as the primary mode; 65 household surveys, nine semi-structured interviews with community leaders, SPV developers, and local officials, and seven focus group discussions with farmers and livestock keepers were conducted across the three study areas. National energy and water policy documents, reports, and strategic plans were also reviewed to contextualise the institutional frameworks governing energy and water delivery in rural areas. Findings reveal limited coordination among stakeholders, particularly between NGOs, government agencies (REA, RUWASA, and NIRC), and local communities in the planning and implementation of SPVWP projects. Top-down delivery mechanisms marginalised community feedback, undermining local ownership and limiting the productive use potential of installed systems. This study proposes an integrated institutional framework that combines systems thinking with bottom-up and top-down approaches, explicitly embedding structured feedback mechanisms and aligning stakeholder roles across all governance levels. The framework was validated through interviews with experts in the rural energy and governance field, confirming its practical relevance and applicability to rural energy–water governance. The framework offers actionable guidance for policymakers and development practitioners seeking to strengthen institutional coordination in rural energy–water–agriculture governance, contributing to progress towards SDG 7 and SDG 2 across sub-Saharan Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Oliva Gonda & Wilbard Kombe & Wim Deferme & Sarah Phoya & Griet Verbeeck, 2026. "A Systems Thinking Analysis of Institutional Frameworks Governing the Energy–Water Nexus for Productive Agricultural Activities in Rural Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-33, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5736-:d:1960227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5736/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5736/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5736-:d:1960227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.