Author
Listed:
- Zhongzheng Liu
(School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)
- Jinfeng Li
(Shanghai Prothentic Co., Ltd., Pudong District, Shanghai 201210, China)
- Ming Liu
(School of Economics & Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Laboratory of High Quality Urban Development and Strategic Decision, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)
Abstract
Sustainable aviation supply chains (SCs) are increasingly exposed to risks arising from environmental regulations, social responsibility pressures, and economic uncertainties. These risks are associated with different SC members and may propagate through operational dependencies among suppliers, maintenance service providers, and airline operators. To support systematic risk assessment, this study proposes a hybrid Analytical Hierarchy Process-Bayesian network (AHP-BN) framework for sustainable aviation SC risk management. The intended contribution is a contextual and structural extension of existing AHP-BN logic to member-level sustainability risk propagation in aviation SCs, rather than a claim that AHP-BN integration itself is fundamentally new. The proposed framework first classifies sustainability risks into environmental, social, and economic dimensions and identifies the risk exposure relationship between SC members and risk factors. For the weighting component, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to derive relative importance weights from specified illustrative pairwise comparison matrices in the numerical experiment. Bayesian network (BN) is employed to model probabilistic dependencies among nodes defined by SC members and risk factors. The two methods are coupled through a weighted expected risk index, which integrates AHP-derived weights, member-specific exposure intensities, probabilities inferred by BN, and losses associated with different risk states. A numerical illustration based on a synthetic aviation SC with suppliers, maintenance service providers, and airline operators is conducted to demonstrate the computational procedure and diagnostic use of the proposed framework rather than to validate an empirical risk profile of the aviation industry. Within this illustrative setting, cost volatility, supplier reliability, emissions regulation, and sustainable aviation fuel availability emerge as the major contributors to the overall risk index under the assumed inputs. The analysis further indicates that the proposed framework can identify critical active pairs of SC members and risk factors, reveal vulnerabilities at the levels of SC members and sustainability dimensions, and provide a transparent decision-support tool for sustainable aviation SC risk assessment, while the resulting rankings should be interpreted as conditional outputs under the assumed input parameters.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5720-:d:1960010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.