Author
Abstract
Retaining bus users is a practical condition for sustainable urban mobility, but transport agencies need defensible passenger-centered measures to judge whether service experience is credible enough to support continued use. This study tests an exploratory measurement approach linking perceived bus service quality, satisfaction, perceived value, and loyalty, using urban bus-user data collected in Pakistan as the empirical setting rather than as a national-representative case. A mixed-mode survey produced 230 responses; 227 valid cases remained after pre-specified screening of ineligible and out-of-frame records. The analysis used item diagnostics, exploratory factor analysis, HC3-robust regression, bootstrapped indirect-association testing, subgroup description, and qualitative coding of open-ended responses. The retained sample was young, student-oriented, and strongly transit-dependent, so the results mainly describe regular bus users with limited modal flexibility. Service-quality items were factorable (KMO = 0.725; Bartlett’s chi-square = 851.56, df = 435, p < 0.001), but parallel analysis supported one dominant general service-quality signal rather than a stable five-dimensional SERVQUAL structure. General service quality (GSQ) is therefore treated as an empirical indicator of perceived service credibility, not as a validated new latent construct. GSQ was positively associated with satisfaction (beta = 0.382, p < 0.001), perceived value (beta = 0.389, p < 0.001), and loyalty after satisfaction and perceived value were included (beta = 0.233, p < 0.001). Bootstrap results were consistent with indirect association through satisfaction (estimate = 0.032, 95% CI [0.011, 0.057]) and perceived value (estimate = 0.035, 95% CI [0.010, 0.062]), while a residual direct association remained. Frequent riders rated reliability, responsiveness, perceived value, and loyalty more critically, but interaction testing did not confirm moderation by bus-use frequency. Open-ended comments repeatedly pointed to punctuality and passenger information, with safety also appearing as a salient threshold concern. The findings support passenger-centered sustainability monitoring by identifying service credibility, reliability, responsiveness, safety, and perceived value as practical indicators for retaining transit-dependent bus users, while ruling out any claim that the imported SERVQUAL structure was fully validated in this sample without confirmatory revalidation.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5717-:d:1959986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.