IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5699-d1959734.html

Urban Park Users’ Expectations for Smart Park Applications: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Türkan Nihan Sabirli

    (Department of Recreation, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir 26555, Türkiye)

  • Yeldanur Urlu

    (Department of Recreation, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir 26555, Türkiye)

  • Sena Öngen

    (Department of Recreation, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir 26555, Türkiye)

  • Arif Yüce

    (Department of Sports Management, Eskisehir Technical University, Eskisehir 26555, Türkiye)

Abstract

As smart city approaches increasingly extend to public open spaces, understanding what urban park users expect from digital park applications has become a critical issue for sustainable urban management. This study examines park users’ expectations of smart park applications through an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. In the first phase (Study I), semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 purposively selected participants representing four user groups—parents with children, sport-oriented users, older adults, and general adults—in urban parks in Eskişehir, Türkiye. Thematic analysis identified eight user expectation themes, which were subsequently operationalized into a seven-factor quantitative structure. In the second phase (Study II), a seven-factor scale derived from the qualitative findings was administered to 374 participants. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated a good overall model fit, and the scale exhibited strong reliability and convergent validity. One-way ANOVA revealed significant between-group differences in six of the seven dimensions, with sport-oriented users consistently reporting higher expectations than older adults. Safety and Activity Diversity was the only dimension showing no significant group differences, indicating a universal expectation across all user profiles. Multiple regression analysis showed that Independent Functionality was the strongest predictor of use intention, followed by Centrality and Communal Function and Safety. Integration of both phases through a joint display revealed that expectations are both universal and user profile-specific, underscoring the need for user-sensitive smart park design. By linking digital park services to user expectations, well-being-oriented park design, and the sustainable use of urban green spaces, these findings contribute to the literatures on smart cities, urban green spaces, and well-being, providing an empirically informed and user-centred framework for digital park applications that may inform efforts toward healthier, more inclusive, and more sustainable urban public spaces in line with SDGs 3 and 11.

Suggested Citation

  • Türkan Nihan Sabirli & Yeldanur Urlu & Sena Öngen & Arif Yüce, 2026. "Urban Park Users’ Expectations for Smart Park Applications: An Exploratory Sequential Mixed-Methods Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-34, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5699-:d:1959734
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5699/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5699/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5699-:d:1959734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.