IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5693-d1959641.html

Unraveling the Spatial Network Topology and Clustering Patterns of Green Transportation Development

Author

Listed:
  • Wenbin Yao

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Muhan Huang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Nan Lin

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Hui Wu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Chunqin Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
    Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Green, Digital and Intelligent (GDI) Renovation for Urban Infrastructures, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Martin Skitmore

    (Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia)

  • Xiaoli Song

    (China Urban Sustainable Transport Research Center, China Academy of Transportation Sciences, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the spatial association network structure of Green Transportation Development (GTD) in China to support coordinated regional development. Based on panel data from 30 major Chinese cities over the period 2011–2020, an entropy weighting method is used to evaluate urban GTD levels, while social network analysis (SNA) and the Quadratic Assignment Procedure (QAP) are employed to identify the spatial network topology, clustering patterns, and driving factors of GTD. The results show that GTD exhibits significant intercity spatial associations. The overall network structure is relatively stable and exhibits a loose hierarchical pattern, with network density fluctuating between 0.232 and 0.277. Shanghai, Yinchuan, and Nanjing play prominent roles in the core–periphery structure. Block modelling further classifies the network into four functional groups: “net spillover,” “bilateral spillover,” “net benefit,” and “broker” blocks. In 2020, the network contained 214 association ties, of which 176 were inter-block ties, indicating evident cross-block spillover effects but relatively weak intra-block communication. The QAP regression results further reveal that geographical distance inhibits network formation, whereas differences in economic development and transport-related employment promote intercity GTD associations; differences in technological innovation exert a negative effect. These findings suggest that policymakers should reduce administrative barriers, formulate differentiated GTD policies, strengthen regional linkages, and promote intercity cooperation based on complementary advantages to improve the overall performance of GTD.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenbin Yao & Muhan Huang & Nan Lin & Hui Wu & Chunqin Zhang & Martin Skitmore & Xiaoli Song, 2026. "Unraveling the Spatial Network Topology and Clustering Patterns of Green Transportation Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-36, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5693-:d:1959641
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5693-:d:1959641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.