Author
Listed:
- Michael Batame
(Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Dennis Baffour-Awuah
(Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Alexa J. Lamm
(Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Kevan W. Lamm
(Department of Agricultural Leadership, Education, and Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA)
- Jeb Fields
(Environmental Horticulture Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA)
- James Altland
(Application Technology Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)
- Guilherme Signorini
(Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA)
Abstract
United States (U.S.) specialty crop growers face myriad decisions regarding substrate selection as sustainability, market demands, and resource limitations influence soilless production systems. Peat is a common component in container substrates despite public concerns about its limited availability, finite supply, and associations with greenhouse gas emissions and environmental impacts, which have prompted growers to seek alternative materials. However, limited research has focused on the experiences, challenges, and research needs of U.S. specialty crop growers related to substrate transitions. The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore growers’ key considerations, research interests, and preferred communication methods associated with substrate transitions. An online survey and three focus groups were used to gain insights into growers’ experiences, concerns, and perceived impacts of peat replacement, research needs, and preferred communication channels. Results indicated that financial costs, peat availability, access to peat alternative substrates, and environmental considerations were the main factors influencing potential changes in substrate use. Growers identified key research priorities to assist decision-making, including (1) irrigation and nutrient management strategies, (2) the economic performance of alternative substrates, and (3) locally validated trials demonstrating system compatibility. They preferred practical communication methods for sharing results, including websites, YouTube videos, in-person meetings, on-farm demonstrations, and short podcasts accessible during routine work hours. The findings implied that research, outreach, and communication efforts tailored to growers’ operational contexts will support informed substrate transitions.
Suggested Citation
Michael Batame & Dennis Baffour-Awuah & Alexa J. Lamm & Kevan W. Lamm & Jeb Fields & James Altland & Guilherme Signorini, 2026.
"Exploring Growers’ Perspectives on Substrate Transitions in American Specialty Crop Production: Challenges and Opportunities for Research and Communication,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-16, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5682-:d:1959311
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5682-:d:1959311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.