IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5658-d1958913.html

Resilient Supplier Selection and Closed-Loop Logistics for Inland Waterway Navigation Hubs Under ESG Constraints

Author

Listed:
  • Yan Wang

    (Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Mengjie He

    (College of Information Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Siqian Cheng

    (Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Youfang Huang

    (Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Jiankun Hu

    (Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

  • Zhihua Hu

    (Institute of Logistics Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, China)

Abstract

Large inland waterway infrastructure projects are increasingly exposed to supply disruptions, logistics uncertainty, carbon-control pressure, and dredged-material management challenges. Although resilient supplier selection, closed-loop supply chains, and ESG-oriented optimization have been widely studied, existing models rarely integrate resilient sourcing, hub configuration, forward material supply, reverse dredged-material resourceization, and social externality penalties within a unified maritime infrastructure decision framework. To fill this gap, this study proposes an ESG-endogenous closed-loop supply-chain optimization model for construction of an inland waterway navigation hub. The model jointly optimizes resilient supplier selection, transshipment/resourceization hub activation, equipment deployment, forward material flows, and reverse dredged-material flows. Three objectives are considered: minimizing economic cost, minimizing carbon emissions, and maximizing net social benefit. In particular, a social benefit and ecological-debt penalty function is introduced to quantify the transition from beneficial reuse to disposal-related negative externalities. NSGA-II is adopted as a multi-objective solver, with parameter calibration, convergence analysis, and benchmark comparison used to evaluate computational performance. The Pinglu Canal project is used as a case study. The results produce 14 Pareto-optimal solutions and show that the lowest-cost and lowest-emission configurations may still generate negative social benefits. A low-cost ESG transition region around 197.3–197.8 million CNY is identified, where limited additional investment can activate resourceization pathways and shift the system from ecological debt to near-saturated social benefit. These findings suggest that sustainable infrastructure planning should move beyond isolated cost or carbon minimization and instead identify balanced supplier–hub–equipment–flow configurations that jointly support resilience, circularity, and ESG performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yan Wang & Mengjie He & Siqian Cheng & Youfang Huang & Jiankun Hu & Zhihua Hu, 2026. "Resilient Supplier Selection and Closed-Loop Logistics for Inland Waterway Navigation Hubs Under ESG Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-24, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5658-:d:1958913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5658/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5658/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5658-:d:1958913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.