Author
Listed:
- Mohamed H. Abdelati
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
- Mostafa Makrahy
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
- Al-Hussein Matar
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
- Ebram F. F. Mokbel
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
- M. M. Moheyeldein
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
- Mohamed A. A. Abdelkareem
(Automotive and Tractors Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, El-Minia 61915, Egypt)
Abstract
Thermal management remains a key challenge for lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles, especially under transient driving and charging conditions. This study develops a coupled thermo-hydraulic model for a liquid-cooled battery thermal management system and uses it to compare four coolants with different thermophysical properties: water, ethylene glycol–water, propylene glycol–water, and Jet-A aviation fuel. Unlike studies that focus mainly on temperature reduction, the present work evaluates battery temperature, hydraulic pump power, and cooling load/heat rejection demand within the same framework. The coolants are tested under the FTP-75 driving cycle and a high-rate charging case while pump speed is varied between 1500 and 4500 rpm. Water provides the strongest cooling performance, reducing the battery temperature during FTP-75 from about 30 °C to 21.2 °C at 1500 rpm and 20.6–20.8 °C at 4500 rpm. During charging, water maintains the battery temperature near 23 °C at 1500 rpm, whereas ethylene glycol–water and Jet-A reach about 46–47 °C. Increasing pump speed improves thermal regulation, particularly for weaker-performing coolants, but it also increases auxiliary demand; for example, the RMS pump power of water during charging rises from 0.039 to 0.735 kW. Overall, the results show that coolant selection in liquid-cooled BTMS requires a balanced assessment of heat removal capability, pumping demand, and heat rejection requirements.
Suggested Citation
Mohamed H. Abdelati & Mostafa Makrahy & Al-Hussein Matar & Ebram F. F. Mokbel & M. M. Moheyeldein & Mohamed A. A. Abdelkareem, 2026.
"Dynamic Thermal and Energy Performance of Liquid-Cooled Electric Vehicle Batteries Using Water, Glycol Mixtures, and Jet-A,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-21, June.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5529-:d:1956993
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5529-:d:1956993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.