IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5483-d1955545.html

Organic Compared to Conventional Crop Yields: A Mini-Review

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Juroszek

    (Dienstleistungszentrum Ländlicher Raum Rheinhessen-Nahe-Hunsrück, Kompetenzzentrum Ökologischer Landbau Rheinland-Pfalz (KÖL), Rüdesheimer Straße 60-68, 55545 Bad Kreuznach, Germany)

Abstract

Organic farming is an alternative method to produce agricultural products. Here, an update of results is provided related to the internationally important topic organic compared to conventional crop yields. The most recently published meta-analyses continue to show that organic crop yields, average across all crop species worldwide, are roughly about 15–25% lower than yields of conventionally produced crops. Organic cereal and potato yields are often 30–40% lower, whereas legume and animal pollinator-dependent crop species are able to match conventional crop yields quite often. Thus, the level of the yield difference is dependent on the crop species among many other factors such as the geographic origin of the yield comparison studies. Here, a summary of informative articles is provided, which can be a useful guide for people, who are interested in the topic organic compared to conventional crop yields. This mini-review concludes that organic farming should be promoted, among other farming systems, although organic compared to conventional crop yields are usually lower, because organic farming has many strengths. For example, in general, organic farming is environmentally friendly, thus a sustainable farming system. Therefore, it might be wise to promote a fair and respectful co-existence of different agricultural production systems, including organic agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Juroszek, 2026. "Organic Compared to Conventional Crop Yields: A Mini-Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5483-:d:1955545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5483-:d:1955545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.