IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5467-d1955111.html

Assessment of Battery-Integrated Hybrid Wind–Solar Plants: A Spanish Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Santiago Alonso-del-Viejo

    (Faculty of Engineering, Distance University of Madrid (UDIMA), C/Coruña, km 38500, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain)

  • Juan José Graña-Magariños

    (Faculty of Engineering, Distance University of Madrid (UDIMA), C/Coruña, km 38500, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain)

  • Isabel C. Gil-García

    (Faculty of Engineering, Distance University of Madrid (UDIMA), C/Coruña, km 38500, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain
    Department of Applied Mechanics and Projects Engineering, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain)

  • Ana Fernández-Guillamón

    (Faculty of Engineering, Distance University of Madrid (UDIMA), C/Coruña, km 38500, 28400 Collado Villalba, Madrid, Spain
    Department of Applied Mechanics and Projects Engineering, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 02071 Albacete, Castilla-La Mancha, Spain)

Abstract

The increasing penetration of variable renewable energy sources requires flexible solutions to ensure system stability and economic efficiency. In this context, this study presents a comprehensive assessment of hybrid plants combining wind farms (WF) and photovoltaic (PV) systems integrated with battery energy storage systems (BESS), using the Casetona project in Spain as a real-world study. Three configurations (PV + WF + BESS, PV + BESS, and WF + BESS) are evaluated based on 2024 operational data combined with simulation tools. Under the assumptions of this study (2024 data, Spanish market), the results indicate that WF generation outperforms PV, mainly due to higher capacity factors and better alignment with high-price periods, while PV output is affected by price cannibalization. Under current Spanish market conditions and at the assumed BESS cost (236 €/kWh), energy arbitrage is not economically viable, yielding negative net present value across all configurations. In contrast, participation in automatic frequency restoration reserve services provides higher revenues under current Spanish market conditions, with the WF + BESS configuration achieving the best performance. From the perspective adopted in this study, the sustainability analysis reveals that the hybrid system enables annual greenhouse gas emissions reductions between 13,695 and 49,195 t C O 2 , e q , depending on the displaced generation source. Although BESS does not directly reduce emissions, it enhances renewable integration, reduces curtailment, and improves grid flexibility. The results also highlight the importance of regulatory frameworks and market design in determining the economic viability of storage systems. While the quantitative results are specific to the case study and sensitive to regulatory parameters, this study provides a comprehensive and transferable methodology for evaluating hybrid renewable systems with storage, supporting informed decision-making in the transition toward low-carbon and resilient energy systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Santiago Alonso-del-Viejo & Juan José Graña-Magariños & Isabel C. Gil-García & Ana Fernández-Guillamón, 2026. "Assessment of Battery-Integrated Hybrid Wind–Solar Plants: A Spanish Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5467-:d:1955111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5467-:d:1955111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.