Author
Listed:
- Faming Li
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
- Tianming Sun
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
- Kaiting Yang
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
- Yuming Shao
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
- Yanhong Huo
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
- Yiqing Liu
(School of Architecture, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China)
Abstract
Under the dual pressures of heritage conservation and tourism growth, improving inclusive access to cultural tourism opportunities in historic urban areas has become an urgent planning issue under Sustainable Development Goal 11 and the Historic Urban Landscape approach. Taking the central urban area of Suzhou, China, as a case study, this study evaluates time-budgeted walkable accessibility, spatial equity, local mismatch, and accessibility-generating conditions from a 15 min city perspective. An integrated analytical framework was developed by combining kernel density analysis, GIS-based network accessibility modelling, Lorenz–Gini equity assessment, bivariate Local Indicators of Spatial Association (LISA), and XGBoost–SHAP interpretation. The results show that cultural tourism opportunities exhibit a clear core polarisation–peripheral attenuation pattern. Within the 15 min threshold, Gusu District records SACR and AAR values of 80.18% and 95.23%, respectively, indicating a pronounced historic-core accessibility advantage. Accommodation-tier differences do not form a simple monotonic relationship with accessibility, but are shaped by the spatial embedding of different accommodation-market segments within the cultural tourism opportunity field. HL units, namely high-tier accommodation near low accessibility, emerge as priority diagnostic areas of local mismatch, while delayed accessibility beyond 30 min becomes particularly evident among elderly visitors. The SHAP interpretation further indicates that leisure-strolling attractions show a more balanced supply–accommodation structure, whereas commercial–cultural mixed and heritage-core attractions are more strongly supply-led. By linking accessibility measurement, equity assessment, local mismatch diagnosis, and mechanism-based explanation, this study provides an operational basis for zonal and typology-oriented optimisation of cultural tourism accessibility in historic urban areas.
Suggested Citation
Faming Li & Tianming Sun & Kaiting Yang & Yuming Shao & Yanhong Huo & Yiqing Liu, 2026.
"Walkable Access to Cultural Tourism Opportunities in Historic Urban Cores: Spatial Mismatch and Interpretable Evidence from Suzhou, China,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-35, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5462-:d:1954934
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5462-:d:1954934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.