Author
Listed:
- Riccardo Fontana
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Mattia Buratto
(Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Elena Smiderle
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Noemi Lagreca
(Department of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Martina Facchini
(Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Chiara Nordi
(Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Francesco Tisselli
(Punto 3 S.r.l., 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Luciano Vogli
(Punto 3 S.r.l., 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
- Peggy Marconi
(Department of Environmental Sciences and Prevention, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy
LTTA—Laboratory for Technologies of Advanced Therapies, Tecnopolo of Ferrara, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy)
Abstract
Healthcare cleaning services are essential for infection prevention but contribute significantly to the environmental footprint of hospital operations through the intensive use of chemicals, water, and energy. This study presents an integrated assessment of a conventional cleaning protocol (TT) and a CAM-compliant environmentally oriented protocol (GREEN, TG) in a real hospital setting (Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy), combining microbiological monitoring with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Surface contamination was evaluated across different risk areas using standardized culture-based methods, while environmental impacts were quantified using a cradle-to-grave LCA approach, focusing on Global Warming Potential (GWP100). Both protocols achieved significant reductions in microbial load, with post-cleaning values consistently below established hygienic thresholds. No pathogenic indicator organisms were detected after cleaning, and the GREEN protocol demonstrated microbiological performance equivalent to or slightly better than the traditional system across all risk categories. LCA results revealed a substantial environmental advantage for the GREEN protocol, with a 43.7% reduction in carbon footprint (−273 g CO 2 e m −2 year −1 ), corresponding to an annual saving of approximately 13.3 t CO 2 e at the facility scale. These reductions were primarily driven by decreased chemical consumption, optimized dosing, and lower laundering temperatures. The findings demonstrate that environmentally sustainable cleaning strategies can maintain high standards of microbiological safety while significantly reducing environmental impacts. This integrated approach supports the adoption of CAM-compliant protocols in healthcare facilities and highlights the importance of combining infection control metrics with life-cycle environmental evaluation to inform sustainable procurement and hospital management practices.
Suggested Citation
Riccardo Fontana & Mattia Buratto & Elena Smiderle & Noemi Lagreca & Martina Facchini & Chiara Nordi & Francesco Tisselli & Luciano Vogli & Peggy Marconi, 2026.
"Sustainable Cleaning Protocols in Healthcare Environments: Integrated Microbiological Assessment and Life Cycle Analysis,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-18, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5446-:d:1954283
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5446-:d:1954283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.