IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5394-d1953067.html

An Urbanization-Aware Remote Sensing Ecological Index for Urban Ecological Quality Assessment: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China

Author

Listed:
  • Yuefeng Zhang

    (Zhejiang Provincial Land Consolidation Center, Hangzhou 310007, China)

  • Bo Zhang

    (Zhejiang Provincial Land Consolidation Center, Hangzhou 310007, China)

  • Wen Huang

    (Zhejiang Provincial Land Consolidation Center, Hangzhou 310007, China)

  • Yushen Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Jialei Xu

    (School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

  • Zhenbei Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China)

Abstract

Rapid urban expansion has intensified interactions between human disturbance and urban ecological processes, creating an urgent need for robust and urban-sensitive assessment tools. To improve the applicability of conventional remote sensing ecological evaluation in cities, this study develops an Urban Remote Sensing Ecological Index (URSEI) by incorporating an Urbanization Index (UI) into the RSEI-based PCA framework. Multi-temporal Landsat observations acquired during the peak vegetation season were used to construct annual ecological indicators, thereby improving the temporal representativeness of ecological assessment. Taking Hangzhou, China, as a case study, URSEI was applied to examine ecological quality dynamics inside and outside the Ecological Conservation Redline (ECR) from 2010 to 2024, together with temporal trend characteristics, indicative persistence patterns, and meteorological associations. The results show that URSEI generally achieved higher first principal component contribution rates than RSEI, suggesting stronger integration of ecological information within the PCA framework. UI exhibited the strongest negative correlation with URSEI among the stress-related indicators, highlighting the importance of explicitly representing urbanization-related disturbance in urban ecological assessment. Citywide ecological quality displayed a fluctuating but weakly improving tendency over the study period, while the ECR consistently maintained higher URSEI values than the overall urban area. However, most detected temporal changes were statistically non-significant, indicating that ecological conditions remained broadly stable rather than showing pronounced improvement or degradation. Temperature-related thermal conditions were predominantly negatively associated with URSEI, whereas precipitation showed mainly positive relationships and a stronger association with URSEI among the climatic variables examined. Overall, URSEI provides an urbanization-aware framework for long-term ecological monitoring and offers a useful basis for ecological management and sustainable planning in rapidly urbanizing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuefeng Zhang & Bo Zhang & Wen Huang & Yushen Wang & Jialei Xu & Zhenbei Zhang, 2026. "An Urbanization-Aware Remote Sensing Ecological Index for Urban Ecological Quality Assessment: A Case Study of Hangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5394-:d:1953067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5394/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5394/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5394-:d:1953067. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.