IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5381-d1952835.html

Cultured Meat Adoption Intention in the Context of Sustainable Protein Transition: Evidence from Young Urban Meat-Eating Adults in Chad

Author

Listed:
  • Anna M. Kaczmarek

    (Department of Food Quality and Safety Management, Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, Poznań University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 31, 60-637 Poznań, Poland)

Abstract

The extant body of evidence pertaining to the acceptance of cultured meat in Sub-Saharan Africa remains limited. The present study examined the determinants of intention to adopt cultured meat among a sample of young, urban, meat-eating adults in Chad ( n = 290, from a recruited sample of 304). This was achieved using a cross-sectional online survey. Hierarchical OLS with HC3-robust inference was estimated across five hypothesis blocks, complemented by dominance analysis, binary outcome sensitivity, and exploratory triangulation (Bayesian, elastic net, conditional random forest). Approximately half of the respondents expressed a willingness to try cultured meat (52.4%). The final model accounted for 30.6% of the intention variance (adjusted R 2 = 0.188). Following Holm’s correction for multiple comparisons, the conventional-meat and knowledge blocks did not demonstrate a significant difference. The product beliefs (Δ R 2 = 0.056, p = 0.022), affective risk barriers (Δ R 2 = 0.086, p = 0.004), and value fit (Δ R 2 = 0.039, p = 0.048) were found to be significant, with affective risk ranking first in dominance analysis (22.8%). Binary sensitivity analysis demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC = 0.744), although no block remained significant after correction. Exploratory analyses yielded convergent results, including notably robust Bayesian support for excluding the conventional-meat block (BF01 = 1.66 × 10 12 ). Sensitivity power analysis confirmed adequate power (≥0.80) for the significant blocks, but indicated that the conventional-meat non-significance may partly reflect limited power (estimated power = 0.47). Cultured meat adoption intention was more strongly associated with affective risk and value fit appraisals than with conventional meat purchase priorities. This suggests that acceptance strategies should prioritise risk reduction, trust-building, and perceived value. The findings should be interpreted as applying to a digitally connected, young, urban, meat-eating, predominantly tertiary-educated early-adopter-like segment (90.5% with university-level education; 72.7% residing in cities of more than 500,000 inhabitants), rather than to the general Chadian population.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna M. Kaczmarek, 2026. "Cultured Meat Adoption Intention in the Context of Sustainable Protein Transition: Evidence from Young Urban Meat-Eating Adults in Chad," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-30, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5381-:d:1952835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5381-:d:1952835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.