IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5359-d1952253.html

An Exploratory Comparative Study of Consumer Acceptance of 3D Printed vs. Conventional Plant-Based Salmon Analogues: An Innovative Approach to Sustainable Food Production

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Winkler

    (Institute of Management, Krakow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Alicja Basara

    (Institute of Management, Krakow University of Economics, 31-510 Krakow, Poland)

  • Bartłomiej Zieniuk

    (Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Tarnowska

    (Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The modern world faces numerous challenges related to environmental degradation, climate change, and the growing demand for food in the context of rapid population growth. One of the key areas in which solutions supporting the idea of sustainable development can be sought is in society’s dietary habits and the implementation of innovative approaches to food production. Among these, 3D food printing has attracted growing attention as a promising approach for designing plant-based products with tailored structure, composition, and sensory properties. However, the broader adoption of 3D-printed foods may depend largely on consumer acceptance. The aim of this study was to compare the sensory evaluation and perceived market value of two plant-based salmon analogues: a conventional vegan product commercially available on the domestic market (Product A) and a vegan salmon analogue produced using a 3D food printing approach (Product B). An exploratory consumer study was conducted with 20 adult participants representing two dietary groups: meat consumers and non-meat consumers. Two tasting panels were organised, and both products were evaluated using a structured hedonic questionnaire covering appearance, aroma, colour, taste, texture, packaging, perceived ingredient composition, acceptable price, and purchase intention. Data were analysed descriptively and by means of McNemar’s test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, including subgroup analyses by dietary profile. Product B received significantly more favourable ratings for aroma, taste, texture, and acceptable price, and it generated a higher declared purchase intention than Product A. The difference in purchase intention between the two products was statistically significant. More positive evaluations of Product B were particularly evident among non-meat consumers. These findings suggest that, in the context of this exploratory tasting study, the 3D-printed plant-based salmon analogue showed promising consumer acceptance, especially among respondents already oriented toward plant-based diets.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Winkler & Alicja Basara & Bartłomiej Zieniuk & Katarzyna Tarnowska, 2026. "An Exploratory Comparative Study of Consumer Acceptance of 3D Printed vs. Conventional Plant-Based Salmon Analogues: An Innovative Approach to Sustainable Food Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5359-:d:1952253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5359-:d:1952253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.