IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i11p5274-d1950575.html

Achieving Equitable Distribution of Urban Park Green Spaces: A Case Study of Zibo City, China

Author

Listed:
  • Junli Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Tingting Yan

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Weijun Zhao

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Junyi Hua

    (School of International Affairs and Public Administration, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Jinyan Wang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

  • Yanchao Shi

    (School of Civil Engineering and Geomatics, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255000, China)

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has intensified inequalities in the distribution of urban green resources, making green equity a critical concern within the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. This study examines Zhangdian District in Zibo City, China, a representative “Whole-Area Park City” pilot area. This study integrates 1 km population density grid data with GIS network analysis, space syntax, population-weighted service pressure assessment, and a location–allocation model. Using these methods, it evaluates four categories of urban parks from the perspectives of spatial distribution, road connectivity, and social equity. The results reveal that vehicle and cycling modes achieved nearly complete 15 min coverage, whereas pedestrian accessibility remained insufficient. Walking accessibility for comprehensive parks reached 77.69%, whereas that of community parks and petty street gardens was below 33%. Population-weighted analysis further suggests that more than 78% of residents, concentrated in dense central–western neighborhoods, are served by only 21% of total park area. The Gini coefficient of per capita park area reached 0.4765, indicating substantial inequality in park green space allocation. After optimization through the addition of 76 new parks, improvements in road connectivity, and construction of a slow-traffic system, the Gini coefficient decreased to 0.4053, representing a 14.9% reduction. Meanwhile, the population below the national standard declined from 78.09% to 40.64%. These findings reflect spatial accessibility and area-based equity, while actual park service value also depends on park quality, facilities, and user behavior. This study provides quantitative evidence for equity-oriented park planning and a replicable framework for sustainable urban green space planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Junli Zhang & Tingting Yan & Weijun Zhao & Junyi Hua & Jinyan Wang & Yanchao Shi, 2026. "Achieving Equitable Distribution of Urban Park Green Spaces: A Case Study of Zibo City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5274-:d:1950575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/11/5274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:11:p:5274-:d:1950575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.