Author
Listed:
- Zhibin Xing
(School of Business Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, 555 Liutai Avenue, Chengdu 611130, China)
- Zixuan Zheng
(School of Economics and Management, Quzhou College of Technology, Quzhou 324000, China)
Abstract
Rural e-commerce is treated as a lever for common prosperity, but its welfare effect turns non-monotonic across digital-development gradients, raising concerns about the widening urban–rural gap in sustainable regional development. We built a county-year panel of 2725 Chinese counties from 2014 to 2022, with Taobao village density as the treatment, land-based agricultural value conversion efficiency as the county-level mediator, and the Peking University digital financial inclusion digitization sub-index as the moderator. The estimations combine two-way fixed-effect regressions, continuous-interaction moderation, Hansen panel-threshold regression, Callaway–Sant’Anna difference-in-differences, Bartik shift-share instrumentation with Rotemberg-weight diagnostics, and multiple imputation by chained equations supplemented by propensity-score sensitivity checks. Taobao village density linearly depresses rural per-capita disposable income and produces a significant U-shape in the nightlight Gini with an in-sample turning point. The marginal effect on Sen welfare moves from approximately + 0.99 log-units at low digitization to approximately − 0.95 at high digitization, with the sign-reversal becoming statistically significant only above the 55th percentile of the moderator (Hansen threshold at the 85th percentile), so the trap is a tail regime rather than a generalized reversal; over the panel window, however, 80.5% of counties cross into the trap zone in at least one year. Approximately 28 percent of the welfare squeeze passes through the land-based ecological efficiency channel, with parallel mediators delivering 19–90 percent. The deepest squeeze appears in cash-crop counties that platform theory predicted to benefit most, where the welfare effect at high digitization is roughly 3.1 times the staple-grain effect. We label this pattern the Digital Saturation Trap and argue that sustainable urban–rural policy should shift from uniform platform access toward differentiated platform governance in counties beyond the saturation threshold.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5201-:d:1948361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.