IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5134-d1946797.html

Strengthening Energy Security for Food and Beverage Manufacturers: Evaluating the Small Modular Reactor for Power Islanding

Author

Listed:
  • Joe Parcell

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Melanie Derby

    (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Arsen S. Iskhakov

    (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Gennifer Riley

    (Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

  • Alice Roach

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA)

Abstract

Utility disruptions may stem from insufficient power generation, inferior infrastructure, or secondary weather perils (e.g., tornadoes, floods, snowstorms) that take energy infrastructure offline. The latter present a unique risk that not all existing power options can mitigate. Regardless of their origin, power disruptions have the potential to cripple food supply chains and undermine food system sustainability. To prepare for managing future disruptions, food and beverage manufacturers may couple electrical microgrid and thermal district heating infrastructure with small modular reactors (SMRs) or smaller microreactor systems to form low-carbon power islands. Although SMR technology is a somewhat new source of energy and has not yet achieved commercial viability, it provides the potential to make food and beverage manufacturing more resilient and sustainable when it becomes broadly available. To assess the potential cost–benefit of activating such technology as a sustainability-oriented resilience investment, we conducted a technoeconomic downtime threshold analysis. The case assumes that the technology is the full-time power source and the SMR yields stronger returns as facility downtime or downtime costs rise. The analysis found the breakeven point to range from 12.3 h down to 613.2 h down annually for a 5 MW system, depending on facility scale and assumed downtime costs. At a representative downtime opportunity cost of $10,000/h, SMR adoption requires approximately 61.3 h (5 MW) of annual outages to break even, highlighting scale effects on feasibility. Incorporating a 20% thermal energy credit reduces required outage thresholds by roughly 20%, lowering the breakeven level to 49.1 h. These results highlight the potential role of SMR-enabled power islanding in supporting sustainable food manufacturing through improved energy resilience, low-carbon power, and thermal energy recovery.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Parcell & Melanie Derby & Arsen S. Iskhakov & Gennifer Riley & Alice Roach, 2026. "Strengthening Energy Security for Food and Beverage Manufacturers: Evaluating the Small Modular Reactor for Power Islanding," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5134-:d:1946797
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5134/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5134/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5134-:d:1946797. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.