IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5115-d1946399.html

The Sustainability of Biomass Systems in Ghana: A Review of Resources, Governance, and Circular Bioeconomy Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Zipporah Asiedu

    (Faculty for Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany)

  • Alberto Bezama

    (Sustainable Systems Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Nana Y. Asiedu

    (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Private Mail Bag, Kumasi 00233, Ghana)

  • Michael Nelles

    (Faculty for Agriculture, Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rostock, Justus-von-Liebig-Weg 6, 18059 Rostock, Germany)

Abstract

The transition toward a sustainable bioeconomy is increasingly recognised as a key pathway for resource efficiency and climate resilience in emerging economies. However, system-level analyses integrating biomass flows, governance structures, and actor dynamics remain limited, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. This study develops a systems-oriented analytical framework combining material flow assessment, stakeholder mapping, governance assessment, and innovation systems analysis to evaluate the structure, performance, and circularity of biomass systems in Ghana. The analysis focuses on six major biomass sectors: cocoa, cassava, maize, plantain, oil palm, and shea. The results show that Ghana generates substantial biomass resources, yet significant inefficiencies persist, with major residue streams such as cocoa pod husks (~9 million tonnes (Mt) annually) and cassava peels (2.6–3.8 million tonnes annually) remaining largely underutilised. Across sectors, residue utilisation rates remain low, while biomass leakage is driven by fragmented governance, weak coordination among actors, spatially dispersed production systems, and limited processing and technological capacity. Compared with more integrated biomass-based economies, Ghana remains at an early stage of circular transition, despite considerable potential for value addition and resource recovery. The study contributes a transferable systems-based analytical framework for diagnosing circularity gaps and system inefficiencies in data-constrained bioeconomy contexts. Strengthening institutional coordination, decentralised processing infrastructure, and innovation systems is identified as critical for advancing a more circular and inclusive bioeconomy in Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Zipporah Asiedu & Alberto Bezama & Nana Y. Asiedu & Michael Nelles, 2026. "The Sustainability of Biomass Systems in Ghana: A Review of Resources, Governance, and Circular Bioeconomy Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5115-:d:1946399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5115/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5115/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5115-:d:1946399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.