Author
Listed:
- Shuai Zhang
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)
- Fuchun Li
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)
- Yiyun Zhu
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)
- Zhe Li
(School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China)
- Rong Yang
(China JIKAN Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China)
- Yang Shao
(China JIKAN Research Institute of Engineering Investigations and Design Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710021, China)
- Bingyi Wang
(China United Northwest Institute for Engineering Design & Research Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710077, China)
Abstract
Underground Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) is a promising large-scale energy storage technology, yet its long-term operational safety is constrained by progressive tensile damage accumulation in lining structures under cyclic thermo-mechanical loading. Conventional steel-lined caverns are costly, while ordinary reinforced concrete linings require excessive reinforcement due to their limited tensile capacity, compromising the economic viability of CAES. This study proposes a Reinforced-Steel Fibre Concrete (R-SFC) lining as the structural load-bearing layer of CAES caverns, in which the steel fibres provide tensile and crack-propagation resistance and the rebars contribute supplementary tensile capacity. A 2D coupled thermo-mechanical damage-plasticity finite element model was developed in COMSOL Multiphysics and verified using published in situ monitoring data from operating CAES caverns. Parametric analyses of the steel fibre volume fraction, lining thickness, rebar diameter, and cavern diameter were then performed. The results show that the R-SFC lining significantly improves crack propagation resistance, reducing the maximum tensile damage by 41.3% relative to conventional reinforced concrete while lowering steel consumption. Within the lining–rock system, the concrete lining and the surrounding rock jointly resist the radial compressive load, while the steel fibres and rebars bear the hoop tensile stress. A thickness-to-diameter ratio of 1/8 to 1/5 is identified as the recommended geometric design range to balance lining damage against surrounding rock loading. Finally, an MOPSO algorithm coupled with a PSO-BP surrogate model is employed to balance lining tensile damage against cavern dimensions, yielding optimised parameter combinations particularly suitable for cavern diameters around 4 m. The study findings may provide a new lining solution and design reference for cost-effective and high-reliability underground gas storage.
Suggested Citation
Shuai Zhang & Fuchun Li & Yiyun Zhu & Zhe Li & Rong Yang & Yang Shao & Bingyi Wang, 2026.
"Plastic Damage Analysis and Structural Optimisation of Reinforced-Steel Fibre Concrete Lining for Underground Gas Storage Caverns,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-28, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5096-:d:1945852
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5096-:d:1945852. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.