IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5094-d1945832.html

The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Amina Hamdouni

    (Department of Finance, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia)

  • Nesrine Gafsi

    (Department of Finance, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study examines the causal impact of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings on corporate green technology innovation using a panel of Saudi listed firms over the period 2015–2024. Adopting a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) framework, the analysis evaluates three dimensions of innovation outcomes—quantity, quality, and efficiency (CGTI1–CGTI3). The results show that ESG ratings significantly enhance green technology innovation. Dynamic evidence indicates that these effects strengthen over time, reflecting gradual adjustment in firms’ innovation strategies. Mechanism analysis reveals that ESG ratings promote innovation primarily by alleviating financial constraints and mitigating agency problems. These effects are driven by improvements in the information environment, as ESG ratings reduce information asymmetry and enhance monitoring. From a theoretical perspective, ESG ratings are conceptualized as a digital information infrastructure that reduces informational entropy and provides algorithmic evaluation signals, thereby guiding managerial decision-making in R&D investment and project selection. Robustness tests, including propensity score matching difference-in-differences (PSM-DID), confirm that the results are not driven by selection bias. Focusing on Saudi Arabia under Vision 2030, the findings highlight the role of ESG information systems in shaping green innovation in an emerging market context.

Suggested Citation

  • Amina Hamdouni & Nesrine Gafsi, 2026. "The Impact Mechanisms of ESG Ratings on Corporate Green Technology Innovation: A Multi-Period Difference-in-Differences Analysis of Innovation Quantity, Quality, and Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-42, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5094-:d:1945832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5094/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5094/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5094-:d:1945832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.