IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5089-d1945745.html

Carbon Information Disclosure Quality in China’s Petroleum and Petrochemical Enterprises: An LLM Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyi Yuan

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, No. 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Ma Zhong

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, No. 159 Longpan Road, Xuanwu District, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Global climate governance and corporate low-carbon transition have made carbon information disclosure important for assessing firms’ environmental governance and climate-risk responses. This study develops an industry-specific carbon information disclosure quality (CIDQ) framework for Chinese A-share listed petroleum and petrochemical firms, using 45 firm-year observations from 15 firms during 2022–2024. The framework includes 7 primary, 15 secondary, and 33 tertiary indicators. Disclosure texts were scored by the DeepSeek-V3.2 large language model (LLM) under predefined rule-based criteria, with temperature set to 0. Reliability was assessed against manual scoring of 15 reports, yielding an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.974. The full-sample mean score is 34.02, accounting for only 51.55% of the theoretical maximum of 66, indicating that the overall disclosure level remains relatively low. The annual mean score increased from 29.07 in 2022 to 37.60 in 2024, representing a cumulative rise of 8.53 points, or 29.34%. Substantial inter-firm differences are also observed: Sinopec recorded the highest three-year average score of 52.67, whereas Yunnan Yunwei recorded the lowest at 10.67. This study may provide a methodological reference for structured CIDQ evaluation and disclosure improvement in high-emission industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyi Yuan & Ma Zhong, 2026. "Carbon Information Disclosure Quality in China’s Petroleum and Petrochemical Enterprises: An LLM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5089-:d:1945745
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5089/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5089/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5089-:d:1945745. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.