IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5085-d1945690.html

Application of the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix in Evaluating Startup Development Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Aija Vonoga

    (Centre for Economics and Governance, Rezekne Academy of Riga Technical University, 115 Atbrivosanas Avenu, LV-4601 Rezekne, Latvia)

  • Anda Zvaigzne

    (Centre for Economics and Governance, Rezekne Academy of Riga Technical University, 115 Atbrivosanas Avenu, LV-4601 Rezekne, Latvia)

  • Inta Kotāne

    (Centre for Economics and Governance, Rezekne Academy of Riga Technical University, 115 Atbrivosanas Avenu, LV-4601 Rezekne, Latvia)

  • Aija Čerpinska

    (Centre for Economics and Governance, Rezekne Academy of Riga Technical University, 115 Atbrivosanas Avenu, LV-4601 Rezekne, Latvia)

  • Baiba Mistre

    (Faculty of Economics and Social Development, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, 2 Liela Street, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia)

  • Nina Wieda

    (Chicago Field Studies Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA)

Abstract

At the outset, startups need to choose a strategy that will enable them to operate in the long term. A proper strategy for startups ensures the development and overall viability of their products or services. The present research was conducted to identify the most suitable development strategies for startups in the Baltic States. Accordingly, the research aims to evaluate alternative startup strategies, considering external and internal factors. Research methods: monographic, SWOT analysis, and the quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM). Experts were selected using the targeted sampling method, based on the following selection criteria: experience in startup management or active involvement in the startup ecosystem in the Baltic States. The research involved 12 experts from Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. The research was conducted between November 2025 and January 2026. The geographical coverage was Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. First limitation of the research was that it provided insight into the five proposed startup strategies for the Baltic States, while other alternative strategies were not considered, given the limited scope and the need for in-depth analysis. The second limitation was that the sample includes 12 experts, including representatives from all three Baltic ecosystems, but they are not in the same numerical ratio. The main conclusion was that the intensive strategy was the most significant one. The second most important alternative strategy was the financial strategy. The least important alternative strategy was the sustainability strategy. The results showed that startups in the Baltic States focused on intensive market entry and product development, as well as strategic financial management, to develop in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Aija Vonoga & Anda Zvaigzne & Inta Kotāne & Aija Čerpinska & Baiba Mistre & Nina Wieda, 2026. "Application of the Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix in Evaluating Startup Development Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5085-:d:1945690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5085/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5085/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5085-:d:1945690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.