Author
Listed:
- Seung-Jun Lee
(Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)
- Jisung Kim
(School of Geography, Faculty of Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)
- Hong-Sik Yun
(Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Republic of Korea)
Abstract
Ensuring the sustainability of ageing water-storage infrastructure is an increasingly urgent challenge under climate-driven hydrological extremes. In the Republic of Korea, approximately 18,000 small and medium-sized agricultural reservoirs—many several decades old—pose escalating risks to downstream communities and threaten progress toward SDGs 6, 11, and 13. This study presents a 0.5 m airborne LiDAR-based, GPU-accelerated two-dimensional shallow-water simulation of a hypothetical breach of the Geumosan Reservoir, South Korea, using a MUSCL + HLL solver verified against the Ritter (1892) and Stoker (1957) analytical dam-break solutions. Two scenarios are compared: Run A with a uniform Manning coefficient ( n = 0.035) and Run B with spatially variable roughness derived from the Korean Ministry of Environment land-cover map (mean n = 0.0711). Mass conservation is preserved to within 0.01% during the closed-domain phase. Spatially variable roughness expands the total inundated area by 8.5% (3.05 → 3.31 km 2 ) while reducing the Extreme-hazard zone, defined by the DEFRA hazard rating HR = h ( v + 0.5), by 24% (1.49 → 1.14 km 2 ); arrival times in the downstream urban corridor are delayed by up to 30 min. Uniform Manning assumptions therefore systematically overestimate extreme-hazard extents while underestimating the broader shallow-inundation footprint—biases comparable in magnitude to breach-parameter uncertainty. By delivering reproducible, georeferenced hazard, arrival-time, and damage-class maps for emergency action planning, the proposed framework supports risk-informed and sustainable management of ageing reservoir infrastructure and community-level disaster resilience aligned with the Sendai Framework and SDGs 6, 11, and 13.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5078-:d:1945614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.