IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5063-d1945390.html

Quality-Matched Life Cycle Assessment of CCU Supply Chains for SMR Tail Gas CO 2 in Industrial Parks

Author

Listed:
  • Jiuli Ruan

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • Yisong Wang

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Tao Du

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Lu Bai

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China)

  • He Jia

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Yingnan Li

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

  • Peng Chen

    (Key Laboratory of Eco-Industry, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China)

Abstract

Carbon capture and utilization (CCU) is imperative for industrial decarbonization. However, current life cycle assessment (LCA) methodologies often apply a static, one-size-fits-all approach, assuming a 99% CO 2 purity standard for all utilization pathways. This ignores the thermodynamic limits of capture technologies and the tolerance of certain endpoints for coarse gas, leading to severe over-purification energy penalties. To bridge this gap, we developed a quality-matched dynamic LCA framework targeting steam methane reforming (SMR) tail gas in industrial parks. A superstructure matrix was constructed, coupling 16 capture configurations (spanning chemical absorption to cryogenic separation across 85–99% purities) with five utilization pathways, under a dynamic grid decarbonization model (2024–2060). The baseline scenario shows that methanol is the most carbon-intensive pathway at 16.88 kg CO 2 -eq per kg CO 2 utilized, whereas mineralization and concrete curing remain near break-even at 0.221 and 0.010 kg CO 2 -eq, respectively. When low-purity demand is matched with PSA capture at 85–90% purity, the net GWP of mineralization and concrete curing decreases to 0.134 and 0.005 kg CO 2 -eq, corresponding to capture-stage penalty reductions exceeding 60% relative to unnecessary 99% purification. Under the dynamic electricity scenario, concrete curing reaches the net-zero tipping point around 2031, and the coupled mineralization substitution strategy ultimately achieves −0.046 kg CO 2 -eq per kg CO 2 utilized. These findings provide a compelling scientific basis for policymakers to design dual-grade CO 2 pipeline networks and prioritize low-purity, high-circularity building materials over carbon-intensive chemical synthesis in near-term industrial transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiuli Ruan & Yisong Wang & Tao Du & Lu Bai & He Jia & Yingnan Li & Peng Chen, 2026. "Quality-Matched Life Cycle Assessment of CCU Supply Chains for SMR Tail Gas CO 2 in Industrial Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5063-:d:1945390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5063/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5063/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5063-:d:1945390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.