Author
Listed:
- Yuwei Shi
(College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Qianwei Wang
(College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Xiandong Li
(College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
- Lingfei Zhang
(College of Economics and Management, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China)
Abstract
Improving the climate adaptability of farmers is crucial to ensuring agricultural production and achieving the goal of sustainable development in agriculture. Against the background of climate change aggravating agricultural risks, how do farmers’ own risk attitudes affect their adaptive behavior? Based on the micro-survey data of 480 grape growers in the Turpan-Hami Basin in 2025, we used the least squares method (OLS) to explore the impact of risk appetite on the climate adaptation behavior of farmers and its mechanism. The study found that risk appetite significantly promoted the adoption of adaptive behaviors by farmers. For every 1 unit increase in the risk preference score, the number of climate-adaptive behaviors adopted by farmers increased by an average of 0.322. Mechanism testing shows that both formal credit and informal credit play a partial intermediary role. The intermediary effect accounts for 18.3% and 36.3% respectively, and the transmission effect of informal credit is stronger; Institutional trust and interpersonal trust both positively regulate the relationship between risk preference and adaptive behavior at the level of 1%. Research shows that we should take into account risk education and production environment optimization, pay attention to the supplementary role of private lending, and build a multi-level trust promotion system to jointly improve the climate adaptability of farmers.
Suggested Citation
Yuwei Shi & Qianwei Wang & Xiandong Li & Lingfei Zhang, 2026.
"Impact of Risk Preference on Grape Growers’ Climate Adaptation Behaviors: Mediating Roles of Credit Access and Moderating Roles of Social Trust,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-24, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5062-:d:1945442
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5062-:d:1945442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.