Author
Listed:
- Andrey Alexandrovich Zaytsev
(Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)
- Dmitry Grigorievich Rodionov
(Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)
- Evgeniy Alexandrovich Konnikov
(Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)
- Nikolay Dmitrievich Dmitriev
(Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)
- Alina Sergeevna Furtatova
(Graduate School of Industrial Economics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia)
- Zengwei Yuan
(School of Environment, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)
Abstract
The efficient use of associated petroleum gas (APG) is one of the key challenges facing the oil and gas sector because it is directly related to reducing hydrocarbon losses, lowering emissions, and improving the sustainability of energy systems. The aim of the study is to develop a multi-criteria risk assessment system for APG utilization projects in three BRICS countries, using Russia, China, and India as examples. Methodologically, the study combines expert risk ranking based on the Fishburn method, spatial aggregation across 16 oil and gas clusters, and hierarchical graph modeling, which makes it possible to trace the transition from local technological constraints to the level of architectural strategies. As a result, a unified risk matrix was constructed, including risks of leaks, fluctuations in gas composition, raw material quality requirements, infrastructure constraints, and the energy intensity of processes. The resulting assessments showed that the risk profiles of clusters differ significantly both between countries and within them. For Russian clusters, leaks and infrastructure constraints proved to be more significant; for some Chinese clusters, gas composition and quality were more critical; whereas Indian clusters are characterized by a mixed profile of constraints. It was concluded that projects involving the use of APG require a cluster-oriented approach, and that universal technological solutions that do not account for the territorial structure of risks have limited applicability.
Suggested Citation
Andrey Alexandrovich Zaytsev & Dmitry Grigorievich Rodionov & Evgeniy Alexandrovich Konnikov & Nikolay Dmitrievich Dmitriev & Alina Sergeevna Furtatova & Zengwei Yuan, 2026.
"Multi-Criteria Risk Assessment Framework for Associated Petroleum Gas Utilization Projects in BRICS Countries: Evidence from Russia, China, and India,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5043-:d:1944810
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5043-:d:1944810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.