Optimizing Investment Programs for Residential Buildings Through CO 2 e Footprint Assessment Under Seismic Risk

Programs aimed at reducing the CO 2 e footprint associated with the residential building stock should be informed by several key elements, including the expected evolution of the occupied housing stock, projected population dynamics driven by socio-economic and cultural factors, available implementation budgets, and the specific costs of intervention measures. However, in regions characterized by high seismic hazard, the occurrence of a major earthquake may substantially alter the projected outcomes of emission-reduction programs, as seismically vulnerable buildings may experience severe structural damage. This paper presents the results obtained by applying an integrated methodology for assessing the CO 2 e footprint associated with residential buildings. The methodology accounts for emissions related to building operation (space heating), energy-renovation interventions, and seismic retrofitting works. While the proposed approach is applicable to other seismically exposed regions, the results presented herein refer specifically to the residential building stock in Romania and its local seismic conditions. The methodology integrates information on the existing building stock, the projected evolution of population and the built environment, energy consumption associated with building operation, changes in the energy fuel mix, construction practices across different historical periods with respect to energy efficiency and seismic protection, and the CO 2 e footprint associated with energy renovation and seismic retrofitting. In addition, the analysis explicitly considers the potentially negative effects of a major earthquake, particularly the disruption of greenhouse-gas emission-reduction programs. The assessment is conducted at the building stock level and is based on combining building stock evolution with average, representative CO 2 e intensity values for heating, energy renovation, and seismic retrofitting. The results demonstrate that when the sole objective is to reduce the CO 2 e footprint associated with space heating, renovation of the energy fuel mix represents the most effective measure. At the same time, the analysis shows that the CO 2 e footprint generated by construction works for energy renovation and/or seismic retrofitting represents only a small fraction of the emissions associated with building operation. The occurrence of a major earthquake is likely to jeopardize overall environmental objectives by increasing emissions related to building operation, energy renovation, reactive seismic retrofitting, and replacement of severely damaged buildings. Conversely, systematic preventive seismic retrofitting of the building stock does not lead to an increase in cumulative CO 2 e emissions over the program implementation period.