IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v18y2026i10p5029-d1944498.html

Optimizing Carbon Partitioning in Sweet Sorghum: A GGE Biplot and Multivariate Assessment of Biomass–Sugar Trade-Offs and Bioethanol Stability Across Water Regimes

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Devlet

    (Department of Field Crops, College of Agriculture and Natural Sciences, Seyh Edebali University, Bilecik 11230, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study investigates the physiological trade-off between biomass yield and sugar concentration in five sweet sorghum genotypes to evaluate how carbon partitioning influences bioethanol potential. Field experiments were conducted over the 2019–2020 seasons in the East Marmara transitional zone of Türkiye, under irrigated and rain-fed regimes. Results revealed a highly significant genotype × water regime interaction ( p < 0.001). A distinct trade-off was identified: while the hybrid ‘Teide’ maximized juice volume under irrigation (2427.67 L ha −1 ), ‘Leoti’ maintained superior sugar stability (18.38 °Brix) under moisture deficit. Genotype plus Genotype × Environment Interaction (GGE) biplot analysis indicated that ‘Early Sumac’ provided the highest environmental buffering, balancing productivity and sugar density across water regimes. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) demonstrated that plant height (averaging 214.2 cm) was positively associated with juice yield and concentration. Under irrigation, ‘Teide’ produced the highest bioethanol yield (1690.7 L ha −1 ), whereas ‘Nutrihang’ led output under rain-fed conditions. While these site-specific trends offer valuable insights into local bioenergy stability, further multi-location trials are necessary to confirm these patterns on a broader scale. The findings conclude that feedstock selection must be categorized by water availability to optimize sweet sorghum-based bioenergy systems in water-limited environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Devlet, 2026. "Optimizing Carbon Partitioning in Sweet Sorghum: A GGE Biplot and Multivariate Assessment of Biomass–Sugar Trade-Offs and Bioethanol Stability Across Water Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5029-:d:1944498
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5029/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/18/10/5029/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:18:y:2026:i:10:p:5029-:d:1944498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.